Sunday, December 28, 2025

Five Traits of the Pharisees Jesus Found Appalling



Five Traits of the Pharisees Jesus Found Appalling

A biblical reflection on five traits of the Pharisees Jesus condemned

—hypocrisy, pride, legalism, blindness, and religion without transformation.


1) Hypocrisy — Outward Piety, Inward Corruption

Jesus repeatedly called the Pharisees hypocrites - people who appeared righteous on the outside while remaining corrupt within. He compared them to vessels scrubbed on the exterior but filled inwardly with greed and self-indulgence (Matthew 23).

“You clean the outside of the cup and dish, but inside they are full of greed and self-indulgence.”

Core idea: Their religious observance did not reflect a transformed heart.


2) Obsessing Over Rules While Ignoring Justice, Mercy, and Faithfulness

Jesus rebuked the Pharisees for their fixation on minor religious details - such as precise tithing, while neglecting the weightier matters of God’s law: justice, mercy, and faithfulness (Matthew 23).

“You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel.”

Core idea: They elevated human rule-keeping above God’s moral demands.


3) Burdening Others Without Helping

The Pharisees imposed heavy religious burdens on others — endless rules and expectations. Without lifting a finger to help those crushed beneath them (Matthew 23:4).

This stands in stark contrast to Jesus’ own invitation:

“For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.” (Matthew 11:30)

Core idea: They made life spiritually heavier instead of leading people into freedom.


4) Seeking Honor and Public Recognition

Jesus exposed the performative nature of Pharisaic religion. Their devotion was designed to be seen — enlarged phylacteries, long tassels, prestigious seats, public greetings, and revered titles (Matthew 23:5–7).

“All their deeds are done for men to see.”

Core idea: Their religion pursued admiration rather than humility.


5) Blindness — And Misleading Others

Jesus called them blind guides — unable to perceive spiritual truth themselves and actively preventing others from entering the Kingdom of God (Matthew 23:13–29).

“You shut the kingdom of heaven in people’s faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor do you let in those who wish to enter.”

He accused them of converting people only to make them “twice as much a son of hell,” of manipulating sacred language for personal advantage, and of appearing righteous while being inwardly corrupt — like whitewashed tombs filled with decay.

“On the outside you appear righteous, but on the inside you are full of hypocrisy and wickedness.”

Core idea: Their leadership blocked access to God rather than opening the way.


Two Bonus Traits

Self-Righteous Pride

Jesus illustrated this through the parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector (Luke 18:9–14). The Pharisee thanked God that he was not like others, while the tax collector cried out only for mercy.

“Everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but the one who humbles himself will be exalted.”


Lovers of Wealth

Luke records bluntly that the Pharisees were lovers of money and scoffed at Jesus’ teaching:

Jesus: “You cannot serve both God and money.” - Luke 16:13.

Me: Though I have always known about The Lord's saying about serving two masters, the verse which follows - verse 14 completely escaped me till now.

Verse 14 (Luke): The Pharisees, who were lovers of money, heard all of this and were scoffing at Jesus.


In Summary

Jesus condemned the Pharisees not simply for being religious, but for religion without transformation.

Outward show over inward change.
Rule-keeping over justice and mercy.
Pride over humility.
Leadership that misled rather than healed.

This was not a rejection of faith — it was a judgment on faith emptied of love, truth, and repentance.


I rest my case

Don Kenobi 

Saturday, December 27, 2025

Many Antichrists have come….




A Reflection On False Gospels, 

Christian Leadership In Nigeria,

Selective Outrage,
And How Internal Corruption Is Far More Damaging 

To The Body Of Christ
Than The Subjects Of Conspiracy Theories.



The Antichrist is an office. An ancient one. Fully staffed, with a well-rehearsed game plan. Those who reject the truth, To them is sent an Antichrist 2 Thess. 2:11 One who is fit for the purpose for which he has been sent...

hje is and always will be a "Man of lawlessness".

That is an exact quote from the bible.

read it yourself: 

The Man of Lawlessness
9The coming of the lawless one will be accompanied by the working of Satan, with every kind of power, sign, and false wonder,

10and with every wicked deceptiondirected against those who are perishing, because they refused the love of the truth that would have savedthem. 

11For this reason God will send them a powerful delusion so that they believe the lie,…

 

Scripture does NOT speak of this office in vague or mystical terms. It speaks plainly: “Even now, many antichrists have come.”

The Antichrist Is An Ancient Office.



The full passage is worth reading slowly: “The world is passing away, along with its desires; but whoever does the will of God remains forever. Children, it is the last hour; and just as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have appeared. This is how we know it is the last hour. (1 John 2:17–18)


The text says many. Plural. Already.
Meaning this evil does not arrive once at the end of time. It comes and goes. 


Verse 19 is equally interesting:

19a: They went out from us, but they did not belong to us. 

19b: For if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us.

19c: But their departure made it clear that none of them belonged to us.”  



The Four Horsemen, Riding Together

A certain leader today fulfils the attributes of all four horsemen of the apocalypse:

  • An undeserved crown — riding a white horse, carrying a bow but no arrows (conquest through deception; cf. Revelation 6:2)
  • War through division
  • Famine through economic violence, even in the middle of abundance
  • Death, not only of bodies, but of institutions, language, trust, and mercy


All four horses ride together. Not from heaven, but from a heart intoxicated with power.

This raises an unavoidable question: 

How can we call ourselves Christians and yet cling to one who is clearly not from heaven—one drunk on dominance, spectacle, and self-worship?


A Question That Refuses to Go Away

In recent weeks, while engaged in debate—which I have found genuinely beneficial to my own learning—a question kept returning.


Why is there no anti-Buddha?
Why is there no anti-Moses?
Why is there no anti-Muhammad?


Why does this counterfeit phenomenon keep appearing only in Christianity?


Why Power Hates Christ

I believe the answer is simple and disturbing: power hates the story of Christ.


Christ is a King who refused the throne. His heart lay not with the rich and powerful, but with the poor, the broken, and the downtrodden. He preached mercy and placed it higher than justice. He sacrificed Himself to set captives free.


Power knows it cannot defeat Christ.
So it seeks to replace Him.


Counterfeit Christianity

There exists a certain so-called “National Prayer Breakfast” movement that has been exported across nations. Its creed is not subtle. It seeks to replace Christ with a figure who projects power. The Netflix Series: "The Family" throws more light on this opaque organisation whose proper name is, "The Fellowship".


...And yet many who consider themselves seasoned Christians—especially those who have been believers for decades—remain astonishingly blind to the machinations of such movements. 


Let's face it - events such as the National Prayer Breakfast present themselves as spaces of moral accountability. 


Yet their structure raises a troubling question: when religious leaders are invited into proximity with power without the ability to challenge it, prayer risks becoming ceremonial. 


Historically, whenever religion trades confrontation for access, it loses authority. 1st Corinthians 15:33 says this in warning: "Evil communication corrupts good manners,"

(Evil Communications: Bad influences. Associating with corrupt people—will negatively change one's character - good manners)

And this is just one of several supposedly Christian organisations. Movements speak the same language, use the same symbols, and quote the same Scriptures, but are animated by a spirit other than the Holy Spirit.


Back to Nigeria: An Uncomfortable Truth

Here is the uncomfortable truth.


The Christian Association of Nigeria has chosen to trade in conspiracy theories
rather than lift a finger to help those they claim to represent.


Fulani expansionism.
Jihad.
Jihad.
Jihad.


Yet the Islam they loudly decry acknowledges Christ as one of its prophets,

acknowledges his as the Word of God, and speaks about His return.


I make bold to say that Islam does far less damage to the Body of Christ than the false gospels preached in His name, which they (the Christian Association of Nigeria) quietly tolerated.


And the pastors who preach such heresy?

They form its executive arm. 


They lift no finger to help the poor, yet cry persecution at every discomfort.

They excuse cruelty, canonize greed, and baptize lies, all while claiming to be messengers of the Cross.


Jesus: “Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.”
Many pastors: “Hmm… let’s manage expectations, Lord!.”


Jesus: “Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.”Some Pastors: “Yes… but first, let’s discuss.... have they paid their...."

Knowingly or unknowingly, they have become foot soldiers of the Antichrist—not because they deny Christ, but because they defend everything Christ refused to be.


Remember This

The Antichrist does not oppose Christ by denying Him.

He opposes Christ by impersonating Him.


He promises salvation without repentance, victory without sacrifice, and power without love.

Every age gets the Antichrist it deserves.


Let those who have ears hear.
Let those who have hearts discern.


I rest my case
Don Kenobi

Chapter 2 | Nation-Building: Why Quasi-Democracies Fail

Chapter 2 | Nation-Building: Why Quasi-Democracies Fail

A Survival Framework

In 2006, Finland’s government published The Strategy for Securing the Functions Vital to Society.
It identified three pillars for any nation’s survival:

  • Livelihood of the population

  • Security of the nation

  • National sovereignty

Remove any one of these, and the state begins to wobble.


Nigeria’s Illusion of Wealth

How does a country sustain its people, defend itself, and grow with a mono-product economy—while spending 70% of its budget on salaries?

Nigeria tried.

And in doing so, it built an illusion of wealth:
private jets, champagne parties, lavish weddings, first-class travel.

One president even challenged a World Bank report ranking Nigeria among the world’s five poorest countries, boasting:

“If you talk about ownership of private jets, Nigeria will be among the first 10.”

But the truth was stark.

For years, his government spent $10 billion annually importing refined fuel—
while three local refineries sat idle.


Failure by Design

No ambitious nation hands out $10 billion every year to foreigners to produce what it can do for itself.

Imagine a top oil exporter, with idle refineries and 80 million poor citizens, still outsourcing fuel production.

Without mincing words: that is preposterousness.


A Colonial Hangover

Paul Louden-Brown, archivist for the Titanic, once said:

“From the very day that she was designed, she was almost doomed.”

Colonial Africa was much the same.

Independence often amounted to a shift change on the plantation.
The foremen’s skin colour changed, but the exploitation continued.

In 1936, Nigeria earned £6.2 million (≈£387m today).
Over £1.1 million (≈£71.5m today) went back to Britain as “home pay” for officials.
The balance left less than £13 per capita.

Colonial powers came to plunder.
No argument there—it is what colonial powers do.
African empires did the same.

But independence should have reset priorities.

It did not.


The Path of Least Resistance

“The path of least resistance leads to crooked rivers and crooked men,”
a friend once said, quoting Henry David Thoreau.

Then he added:

“I can never forget the joy of finally owning a home in Houston—lakes all around me.
Now imagine if I hadn’t paid for it, if it had been bought with the proceeds of corruption…
why would I stop at just one house?”

It is what politicians do—
acquire property through filthy lucre.


Power and Plunder: An Old Story

Caesar arrived in Spain (61–60 BC) as governor, drowning in personal debt.
He launched campaigns that brought in booty, tribute, and land seizures.

By the time he left, he was, as one historian put it:

“Rich in spoils, crowned with glory, and free from debt.”

This is not new.

Aspirations to wealth and grandeur have driven the quest for political power for thousands of years.

The sooner the governed—especially in quasi-democracies—accept this truth, the better.


Quasi-Democracy: What Is That?

quasi-democracy is democracy in name only.

It has the forms of democracy—
elections, parliaments, constitutions, political parties—
but lacks the substance.

Put simply:

Quasi-democracies have the structures of democracy, but not the culture.


Culture vs Structure

To paraphrase my old business school professor, Capt. John Sanders:

“Culture is like computer software—it differentiates two machines with the same hardware.
The quality of the software determines which one outperforms the other.”

That may be the best illustration of the difference between democracies and quasi-democracies.


Democracy on Paper

In a quasi-democracy, you can vote—
but your vote may or may not count.

Elections are not truly free, often extremely expensive, and rarely fair.

Institutions—courts, legislatures, electoral bodies—exist on paper.
In reality, they are only as strong as the ruling elite allow them to be.

These are democracies in name only.

(Some might argue they would function better as progressive autocracies. China comes to mind.)


Examples of Quasi-Democracies

There is broad consensus that the following fit the description:

  • Russia → Elections exist

  • Turkey → Multiparty system, increasing authoritarianism

  • Venezuela

  • Nigeria → A true D.I.N.O (Democracy In Name Only)

  • Pakistan → Military and elite patronage dominate

  • Hungary → “Illiberal democracy”

  • Singapore (debatable) → Elections exist, but long-term one-party dominance


Why Institutions Matter

Quasi-democracies with strong institutions may avoid becoming failed states.
Singapore may be one example.

Without strong institutions, the result is inevitable:

  • Selective rule of law

  • Dominance of ruling elites

  • Corruption and patronage

  • Lack of accountability

The longer institutions remain weak, the more inescapable the slide into failure.


Lack of Vision or Corruption?

Which came first:
the lack of vision—or corruption?

We are often told corruption is the root cause of underdevelopment.
The statistics seem convincing.

But is that really true?

Evidence suggests something deeper:
the most underdeveloped nations are those with no overarching mission, vision, or strategy.

And even where plans exist, execution is absent.

As Eisenhower said:

“Plans are useless, but planning is indispensable.”


Why Corruption Thrives

Corruption, like disease, thrives in dark, damp, dirty places.

Weak institutions and poor governance create the perfect conditions.

Corruption devastates the poorest and most vulnerable.
Nations can die.

Somalia.
Syria.
Libya.
Venezuela.


What Is Planning?

Planning is the process of thinking through the activities required to achieve a goal.

It is not just writing a plan—
it is maintaining it.


What Is Plan Maintenance?

Every serious plan requires:

  • A monitoring method and schedule

  • A process for evaluating progress

  • A five-year review and update cycle

Without this, strategies collapse into empty promises.


Evidence from the CPI

Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) reveals something uncomfortable.

Europe & Central Asia

Russia has the lowest CPI score (28) in its peer group—
yet the largest GDP and highest GDP per capita.

Are we still confident that “the most corrupt nations are the most underdeveloped”?


The Americas

Venezuela once had a GDP per capita of $30,775—far above Haiti.

Today, Venezuela is a failed state.
Haiti, though poor, still exists.

Venezuela collapsed despite having the largest proven oil reserves on earth.

With a population similar to Saudi Arabia’s, it should have prospered.

It did not.


The Lesson from Venezuela

Venezuela proves two things:

  1. Eisenhower was right—planning without maintenance is useless

  2. Corruption destroys mercilessly

A country that drills oil, sells oil, pays salaries, and mismanages the rest will end up poor.

Nigeria needs to take a long, cold look at Venezuela.

Breaking the cycle will require vision, planning, and courage.


Don Kenobi
#BigAgendaAfrica
Washington DC | July 2015


Next:

Nation-Building – Chapter 3
Bank-o-cracy: A Structural Response to Nigeria’s Culture of Corruption https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/720207892540597106/1630509967363928592



Friday, December 26, 2025

The Cauldron Will Explode: A Case for Enlightened Self-Interest

The Cauldron Will Explode: 
A Case for Enlightened Self-Interest
A powerful campus lecture-style reflection on enlightened self-interest, corruption, youth despair, governance failure, poverty, and why Nigeria keeps boiling toward crisis despite immense wealth.


He tapped the microphone to make sure everyone could hear him, then said:

“Let me read you something from this sheet of paper.”

And he read:

Man 1: Troubling fact or wild exaggeration — Africans can’t rule themselves.
Man 2: You want a true or false?
Man 1: Yes.
Man 2: Absolutely. One hundred percent true. Africans cannot rule themselves.
Man 1: I disagree.
Man 2: Prove me wrong.


The False Argument That Still Sounds True

He walked up to the blackboard and wrote:

“As we moved further away from the date the last British government left Nigeria — that is, Independence — things have only become progressively, nay, exponentially worse.”

Pointing to what he had just written, he asked:

“Is this correct?”

“Yes,” we all answered.

“I agree with you,” he said.
“Still — the argument that Africans cannot rule themselves is false.

“Yes, we have not, in the scheme of things today, demonstrated a capacity to manage the affairs of our nations creditably.
But the real question is this:

What is the problem with getting our act together?


The Class That Was Never About Thermodynamics

Like I said in an earlier post, this was an Engineering Thermodynamics class — and only 32 students were officially registered.

Yet, Professor Sanmi was assigned the amphitheatre just behind Oduduwa Hall, because more than 300 studentsregularly gathered to hear what they fondly called:

“The Exegesis Before the Heat Analysis.”

It was easily the most popular class on campus.

The authorities eventually had to limit attendance to about 300, and entry was by invitation only.

One more thing: if it was a rainy day, students came in their raincoats and umbrellas — because they knew he would be there.
He would deliver the lecture to an empty theatre even if not a single student showed up.

The reason, he explained, was to teach us — and this was his favorite dictum:

“Long obedience in the same direction — that is the most essential thing in heaven and on earth.”


The Question Everyone Knew Not to Answer

“What is the problem with getting our act together?” he asked softly.

Then, in a loud voice, he said:

“Have African people shown a capacity for ruling themselves?
No. No, we have not.
So what, then, is the problem?
Why can’t we get our act together?”

We knew better than to answer.
No one who raised a hand when he asked these rhetorical questions was ever called upon.


Enlightened Self-Interest, Defined

“I’ll answer,” he said finally.
“They simply have not yet learned the dynamics of enlightened self-interest.”

He glanced around, eyes a-glint.

“And what is this — enlightened self-interest? Did someone ask?”

No one had asked.
Still, he waited… sighed… then, smiling faintly, said:

“Since no one wants to know… let me explain it to myself.”

We chuckled.
We knew the routine.

Clearing his throat, he said:

“Enlightened self-interest means pursuing your own greed wisely.
It requires understanding that your welfare depends on others’ welfare.”

It is the opposite of short-sighted greed.

Whereas the enlightened, self-serving politician might say:

“If I want to prosper, the society around me must also prosper,”

the primitive accumulator is incapable of such thought.

Pausing for effect, he asked:

“Have you ever seen maggots on a decaying corpse?”

The enlightened politician thus serves the public good — not out of charity, but out of self-interest.
He knows that honesty, justice, and shared progress ultimately protect his own peace, wealth, and security.

He paused, then asked quietly:

“Write this down.
What is enlightened self-interest?”


Timotheus Breaks the Rules

Timotheus, attending for the first time and unaware of the rules, spoke up:

“It is self-interest guided by conscience and foresight — intelligent selfishness.”

The professor laughed softly.

“Self-interest made intelligent… I like that.”

Then his tone darkened.


The Cauldron We Are Boiling In

“What do we have here instead?” he asked.

“We have a society where primitive accumulators focus solely on their own interests — bending the destiny of the country to their will.

“Creating monstrosities out of our youth.

“Turning the country into a tightly sealed cauldron — one that boils the hopes and dreams of our children, ourselves, our fathers, and our grandfathers to death.”

Dreams that were never extravagant to begin with — modest hopes, easily fulfilled, posing no threat at all to the paradise they have built on a culture of death.

A paradise that thrives at the expense of the well-being of tens of millions of the rest of us.

The cauldron will explode.

Even with the best of intentions, steam boilers in the early industrial age — and long thereafter — still exploded.

Only after the invention of the safety relief valve were additional layers of protection introduced, so that when one layer failed, another would engage.

But with the worst of intentions, this cauldron — where the simple dreams of the weakest among us are forced in to die — leaves them, and us, with no protection at all.

No welfare payments.
No free healthcare.
No vocational training.
No shelter.
No soup kitchens.

One day, that cauldron will burst apart — with catastrophic consequences.


Government as the Problem

He shifted, as if weighed down by what he was about to say.

“Just this morning,” he began,
“I saw a video of two young murderers confessing to kidnapping people off the streets — and killing them.”

Why?

To harvest their kidneys.
Sold to a collector.

He shook his head slowly.

“It’s probably the most distasteful thing I’ve ever seen on social media.
I deleted it immediately.”

The kid had a tyre draped around his neck — and he couldn’t bear to watch what was coming next.

His voice trembled slightly.

“I grieve for the victims — whose only crime was being born in a country where their lives mean nothing.

“But I also grieve for the killers.”

They too are victims of a wicked state.

A state which has no record of their birth.
None.

He paused, letting the silence deepen.

“Nor does it have any solution to the problem that spawns hundreds of thousands — perhaps millions — like them.

“It has no solution because any real solution would curtail their excesses.
Their luxuries.
Their lavish lives.”

He leaned forward, voice steady now:

“It has no solution because government itself is the problem.”


Two Good Presidents in Sixty-Four Years

“With the exception of the First Republic, Nigeria has experienced several presidents.

“The First Republic was essentially a continuation of British rule in all but name.

“However, there has been only one truly good president in all its 64 years.”

He smiled faintly.

“I won’t mention his name, lest supporters of this or that president take offense.”

Then, almost apologetically:

“But my conscience whispers,
‘What about Yakubu Gowon, you dope!’

“And since I never argue with my conscience, I’ll revise that:

In 64 years — aside from the First Republic — we’ve had just two good presidents.


The Numbers That Should Terrify Us

He paused one last time, drew a long, shuddering breath, and said:

“According to Nigeria’s own National Bureau of Statistics,

  • 40.1% of Nigerians were poor by the national monetary poverty line in 2018/19, and
  • about 63% were considered multidimensionally poor — lacking multiple basic services and capabilities.”

Looking up, he added softly:

“What a pity… what a pity.
Such a rich nation…”

Then louder:

“More recent estimates suggest that poverty has worsened.”

Suddenly, he shouted:

“Did you hear that?!”

Yessir!” we shouted back — with roughly the same fervour as Chinese soldiers responding to a command.

He continued:

“More recent estimates suggest that poverty has worsened —
and that more than half the population now fall below the national poverty line.”

Then, slowly:

“And wait for this…
Nigeria is said to have the
largest.
Absolute.
Number.
Of people.
Living in extreme poverty.
Worldwide.

He clapped his hands once.

“Okay — that is the end of The Exegesis Before the Heat Analysis.
Non-Engineering students, you may leave.”



Don Kenobi

#MolueMonologues 

#BigAgendaAfrica 

#EnlightenedSelfInterest 

#PearlOfAfrica 

#OldManInTheMolue 


 




Thursday, December 25, 2025

True Religion Is Love, Identity & Purpose.

True Religion Is Love, Identity & Purpose.

True Religion Is Love, Identity, and Purpose

It does not divide humanity; it enlarges belonging.

A reflective essay on faith as love, identity beyond tribe,

and the dark night of the soul.


Did Religion Truly Divide Us?

Dear Husman,

Before monotheistic faiths, we were not united. We had 250 tribes and 25,000 gods, and we still fought, still killed, still excluded. Religion did not invent division. It created identities large enough to transcend tribe.

Today, a Fulani, an Igbo, a Turk, and a Pakistani can sit together, eat together, and defend one another with their lives because they are Muslims. The same is true if they are Christians. Religion, at its best, enlarges belonging.

True Religion Is a Love Affair

Does love distract you? Then religion distracts you. Does love fulfil you? Then religion is equally guilty. Does love make you want to be a better person, make life worth living, make the world more colourful and music more beautiful?

Does it stir your soul and draw out your better angels? I have known love with another human being that did all these things. Now imagine love from God.

What is religion if not the reciprocation of such love, multiplied infinitely?

Love Also Wounds

But love also wounds. Can love break your heart? Then count religion guilty. Can it frustrate you, exhaust you, make you swear you never want to see it again, even make you want to harm yourself?

Multiply that by infinity. So it is with loving God.

The Dark Night of the Soul

That is why the holiest people speak of the “Dark Night of the Soul”, that most unpleasant season when it feels as though God Himself has turned His back.

Mother Teresa shocked the world when her memoirs were published. For the last four decades of her life, she felt nothing, only absence. And yet she carried on, serving, loving, giving. That perseverance is the stuff of legend.

Religion Is a Vehicle, Not a Destination

Because religion is not a destination. It is a vehicle. Entering a vehicle in Lagos does not mean you have arrived in Benin City. You must fuel it, start the engine, and drive.

You will have flat tyres, maybe more than one. Without determination, even with a vehicle, you will never reach your destination.

I rest.

Don Kenobi