You’ve said a lot. That last paragraph, where you speak about the “quality” of Christians, reveals more about you than about so-called "low-quality" Christians elsewhere. It’s an unfortunate mindset. If there are so many “high-quality” Christians, what have they achieved for the body of Christ? There must be millions of them—yet Christ needed only twelve.
That said, are you suggesting that pedophile priests were merely waiting for Vatican II before indulging their proclivities? That such crimes didn’t exist before Vatican II? Because that’s what your argument implies.
Consider what I’ve written on its merits. Don’t strive to be a “high-quality” Christian. History is littered with the wreckage of self-approved “high-quality” religionists in every faith. Instead, be humble.
Finally, always keep in mind the Parable of the Workers in the Vineyard—we know its key lessons. Chief among them: Jehovah’s grace is not earned. God will bless whom He will bless. He is the I AM THAT I AM, sovereign and beyond our classifications. The first (so-called high-quality Christians) will be last, and the last (the so-called low-quality Christians) will be first—regardless of which form of the Mass they prefer.
Still with me?
Another key lesson from the parable: it reassures newcomers to the faith—especially those who come late in life—that they are fully welcome.
#dk
Postscript:
I could go on to discuss the different times of day when each set of workers was hired and invite a debate on their quality—were the first workers of higher or lower quality than the last? Why was it necessary to hire more? Were workers simply unavailable at first? Were they engaged elsewhere? Or was the initial estimate of the work required too low? Perhaps the estimate was accurate, but the quality of the workers was such that, as the deadline approached, more were needed. Could this be why they were all paid the same wage in the end?
All that can be said is that the owner of the vineyard was faithful to deliver on time…..
Shall we digress for a moment and consider what the true deliverable was? Was it merely the harvesting of grapes? Didn’t the last batch of workers—and the ones before them—linger, hoping against all odds to be called into the vineyard? Why? It was a risk. They faced the very real possibility of going home empty-handed. So what was it about *this* vineyard that made them wait?
Think on these things—I am doing the same.
Part of the deliverable could well have been simply getting the men to cross the threshold of the vineyard—just to cross it—and be rewarded for their faith - waiting outside, hoping to be called in, may have been the true test and whatever work they appeared to do afterward was good, but not relevant to the wages they received.
End of digression.
Bottom line, at the end of the workday, the OWNER of the vineyard would have looked at all that was accomplished and seen that it was good.
(Irrespective of the quality or the lack thereof of workers or the form of the mass used in their respective dioceses)
I rest my case.
(Hope this helps.)
Don Kenobi
#OldManInTheMolue