Sunday, May 17, 2026

Lamentation For Nigeria's Poor: Poverty, Violence, and the Failure of Economic Imagination

 

Lamentation For Nigeria's Poor
Poverty, Violence, and the Failure of Economic Imagination


A reflective essay on poverty, corruption, violence, infrastructure, and economic inequality in Nigeria, exploring how concentrated wealth and failed public policy deepen national instability.

Preamble:

There are moments in the life of a nation when statistics stop being statistics.

They seep into the roads, the markets, the posture of citizens, the temperament of drivers, the architecture of homes, the language of politics, the psychology of survival.

Eventually, poverty ceases to belong only to the poor.

It becomes the climate in which everyone lives. Nigeria may already be there.


The Arithmetic of Despair

100 million people live in abject poverty.

Pause there.

Do not rush past the number.

Assume the average family consists of eight people:
two parents and six children.

That gives us:

  • 12.5 million families

  • 25 million parents

  • 75 million children

Mostly out of school.
Or never enrolled at all.

And perhaps the most frightening thing is not even the poverty itself.

It is the absence of national imagination regarding it.

There appears to be no coherent long-term strategy to economically absorb these millions into productive life.
No serious architecture of hope.
No deliberate system for transforming dependency into participation.

So society improvises.

And improvisation, when multiplied across millions, eventually becomes instability.


When Poverty Becomes Atmospheric

Our strategy increasingly appears to be this:

Each day, pray that we ourselves do not become victims of the methods desperate people devise to separate us from the wealth accumulated around them, and often at their expense.

The signs are everywhere.

Pension funds looted.

Contract prices inflated beyond reason.

Public office converted into private extraction.

Police forces informally privatized by the wealthy, leaving ordinary citizens underprotected.

Imported bulletproof vehicles purchased at enormous cost from foreign manufacturers, placing further pressure on local currencies already weakened by import dependence.

Meanwhile, local manufacturers struggle to survive.

The irony becomes almost unbearable:
the same economic structure that impoverishes millions also weakens the productive sector capable of employing them.

And then society acts surprised when violence expands.


Violence As Culture

Violence is no longer merely criminal.

It has become behavioral.

Even driving reflects it.

Motorcyclists weave recklessly through traffic, daring collision itself.

Not because they are fearless, but because they understand something profound about the psychology of modern Nigeria:

Fear has become social currency.

The assumption is simple:
if anything happens, the crowd itself may become violent.

And so caution no longer emerges from law or civic culture.

It emerges from fear of collective instability.

This is what societal stress looks like before societies openly acknowledge it.


The Economics of Extraction

Consider the structure of public contracting.

Road projects worth hundreds of millions of dollars are awarded to a tiny network of contractors and subcontractors.

At completion, often after questionable workmanship, the proceeds frequently disappear into:

  • luxury holidays abroad,

  • imported vehicles,

  • sprawling mansions occupied by only a handful of people,

  • garages filled with exotic automobiles,

  • symbols of insulation from the society producing the wealth itself.

But infrastructure spending is supposed to circulate through an economy.

That is the point.

Public works historically succeed not merely because roads are built, but because employment spreads.

The multiplier effect matters.

A state spending hundreds of millions with thousands of direct beneficiaries creates stability far more effectively than concentrating wealth within a narrow elite circle.

This is why infrastructure projects have historically revived stagnant economies across civilizations.

Not because concrete itself possesses magic, but because participation creates ownership.


Direct Labour and Economic Distribution

A society serious about stability would rethink how public projects are executed.

Direct labour models, despite inefficiencies, possess one overwhelming advantage:
they distribute participation.

The obsession with elite concentration masquerading as efficiency often produces the opposite:
high unemployment, weak circulation of wealth, and deepening alienation.

An economy cannot permanently exclude millions from meaningful participation without eventually producing social consequences.

This is not ideology.

It is arithmetic.


The Two Economic Religions

Every political system eventually divides itself between two economic philosophies.

The first believes wealth should circulate broadly through society by empowering ordinary people directly.

The second believes wealth should first accumulate heavily at the top, after which economic laws will somehow allow benefits to “trickle down.”

History remains unconvinced.

Yet the debate persists.

Even advanced democracies remain trapped between these competing visions.

Nigeria merely experiences the conflict in more visible and brutal forms.


Even Tyrants Understood This

It is uncomfortable to admit, but even destructive regimes sometimes understood economic mechanics better than morally superior societies.

Adolf Hitler’s Autobahn projects helped absorb massive unemployment and restore economic momentum in post-World War I Germany.

This is not praise of tyranny.

It is acknowledgment of a principle:
large-scale public works can stabilize societies when designed to maximize participation.

Infrastructure is not merely engineering.

It is social architecture.


The Candor of Power

At times, truth escapes accidentally from within political circles themselves.

Former Nigerian Minister of Transportation Rotimi Amaechi once remarked, in substance:

“If Nigerians knew what politicians do with their money, they would stone us.”

The statement shocked many precisely because it momentarily dissolved the polite theater surrounding governance.

And perhaps that is part of the problem.

Too much of governance has become theater.

Too little has remained moral responsibility.


Feed My Sheep

Christ’s instruction to Peter remains one of the simplest economic and spiritual principles ever articulated:

“Do you love me? Feed my sheep.”

The statement was spiritual.
But like many spiritual truths, it carries unavoidable material implications.

To elevate the spiritually poor:
provide spiritual nourishment.

To elevate the economically poor:
provide economic opportunity.

Civilizations often collapse under the weight of unnecessary complexity because simple truths are dismissed as unsophisticated.

Yet simplicity may indeed be the highest sophistication.


Simplicity and National Survival

The solution to mass poverty may not require genius.

It may simply require focus.

If, for even one decade, national policy became consciously organized around lifting the poorest millions into productive economic life:

  • education,

  • vocational absorption,

  • mass infrastructure employment,

  • local manufacturing,

  • housing,

  • sanitation,

  • energy access,

  • transportation,

  • agricultural processing,

the effects would ripple across every class.

Because poverty does not stay confined to the poor.

Eventually it taxes everyone:
through insecurity,
through instability,
through currency weakness,
through fear,
through declining trust,
through violence.


The Elephant and the Refrigerator

There is an old joke:

“How do you put an elephant into a refrigerator?”

Simple.

Open the refrigerator.
Put the elephant in.
Close the door.

“But the elephant will not fit.”

Fine.

Then build a bigger refrigerator.

Or abandon the objective entirely.

But solve the problem honestly.

That is civilization:
the capacity to confront reality directly instead of endlessly performing concern around it.


Epilogue: Poverty Eventually Collects Its Debt

No society can permanently ignore tens of millions of impoverished citizens and remain psychologically healthy.

Eventually poverty becomes atmospheric.

It enters language.
Architecture.
Politics.
Religion.
Driving.
Security.
Education.
Family life.
Even hope itself.

And when hope collapses, societies become dangerous.

Not because people are naturally evil,
but because prolonged exclusion distorts human behavior.

The tragedy is that much of this remains reversible.

The resources exist.
The manpower exists.
The intelligence exists.

What remains uncertain is whether the moral imagination exists.

Deep sigh.

Don Kenobi

#CultureNotStructure

#BigAgendaAfrica

Friday, May 15, 2026

It Is Impossible for True Christians to Hate Islam: IMPOSSIBLE

 

On Christ, Judaism. Samaritans and Islam...


Christianity has never feared persecution.
Its greatest danger has often come from within:
counterfeit versions of the faith that preserve the language of Christ 
while rejecting His Cross. 
A reflection on Samaritans, Islam, Discernment, 
and the voice of the Good Shepherd.

It is impossible for a true Christian to see Islam as the enemy. Impossible: The example of Charles de Foucauld makes this clear. 

Charles who?
Charles de Foucauld.
The French Aristocrat Who Vanished Into the Sahara.

Read about him here: https://donkenobi.blogspot.com/2026/05/st-charles-de-foucauld-aristocrat-who.html

If we need another example, We need only look to Jesus and the Samaritans.

They were a people despised by the religious culture of His day.

Distrusted, mocked, treated as outsiders by many Jews of the period. Yet Christ refused to inherit the hatred of His environment.

Who Really Were The Samaritans?

They were a fractured remnant of Israel itself, descendants of those left behind after conquest and depopulation, later mixed through intermarriage with surrounding peoples.

To many Jews of Christ’s day, they were considered impure.
Compromised.

No longer fully “us.” Which makes Jesus’ posture toward them even more unsettling.

He could have echoed the prejudices around Him.
He could have mirrored the fears of His generation.
He could have reinforced the divisions everyone already accepted as normal.

He did not.

Instead, He stayed among them.

He entered their city.
Accepted their invitation.
Taught them openly.

We have 2 examples of how to deal with those who are not "fully us”.

Do you now agree?
That True Christians CANNOT Hate Islam...

Shouldn't this slow us down?


Christianity Has Always Expected Pressure

Christians have never been promised an easy road.

Every generation of believers has been warned that pressure would come.
Every age of the Church has known misunderstanding, hostility, rejection, and persecution.

This is not strange to Christianity.

It is woven into it.

So the deepest question is not whether Christians will face opposition.

They always have.

The real question is this:

How do Christians respond when pressure comes?

Because the greatest danger to Christianity has never merely been outside the gates.

It is often much closer than that.

Closer.
More familiar.
More difficult to recognise.

It hides in plain sight.

It speaks Christian language.
Quotes Scripture fluently.
Invokes the name of Jesus constantly.
Builds churches.
Sings worship songs.
Carries microphones and titles and platforms.

And yet, quietly, almost imperceptibly, it rejects the Cross.


The More Dangerous Counterfeit

Islam does not pretend to be Christianity.

False Christianity does.

That is why Christ warned repeatedly about deception arising from within.

Not merely enemies outside the walls, but corruption already inside the house.

Not wolves battering down the gates, but wolves standing among the flock, presenting themselves as shepherds.

Somewhere along the line, many believers were handed a gospel emptied of sacrifice.

A gospel without repentance.
A kingdom without obedience.
Blessing without transformation.
Crowns without thorns.
Power without surrender to truth.

The prosperity gospel became, in many places, a substitute religion wearing Christian clothes.

And it shaped people accordingly.

It trained believers to react to pressure the way the world reacts:

With rage.
With threats.
With tribal hostility.
With vengeance dressed up as righteousness.

As though Christ never taught another way.


The Strange Logic of the Cross

Yet mature Christians have always understood something deeper.

Persecution, rightly received, becomes revelation.

Not because suffering is good in itself, but because it exposes what is genuine and what is counterfeit.

Pressure reveals foundations.

And often, persecution becomes an opportunity:

An opportunity to let light shine before those who oppose us.
An opportunity to answer hatred with restraint.
An opportunity to make room for grace where hostility once ruled.

This has always been the scandal of Christianity.

Not power.
Not conquest.
Not domination.

But love.

A stubborn, unsettling refusal to become the thing that hates us.


The Failure of Modern Christianity

We must speak honestly.

A serious problem has emerged within modern Christianity.

Many who loudly present themselves as “defenders of the faith” increasingly resemble the spirit of the world more than the spirit of Christ.

This does not strengthen Christianity.

It corrodes it.

The tragedy is that decades of shallow teaching have produced generations unable to distinguish the Shepherd’s voice from the voice of strangers.

So every angry man sounds prophetic.
Every loud man appears courageous.
Every wolf presents himself as a saviour.

And many applaud.

Because the counterfeit often asks less of us.

It demands less repentance.
Less humility.
Less self-denial.
Less transformation.

It baptises human instincts instead of crucifying them.


The Antichrist Problem

The antichrist does not always arrive denying Christ openly.

Often, he arrives replacing Him.

Replacing the Cross with ambition.
Replacing mercy with tribalism.
Replacing discipleship with spectacle.
Replacing truth with emotional manipulation.

That is why discernment matters.

The Church does not merely need enthusiasm.

It needs clarity.

Because when wolves crowd the pulpit, the flock must rise early and begin searching again for the Shepherd Himself.

Not merely for religious excitement.
Not for performance.
Not for outrage masquerading as zeal.

But for Christ.


Searching Again for the Shepherd

And this is the hope that remains.

The sheep still recognise His voice.

Even now.

Beneath the noise.
Beneath the confusion.
Beneath the religious theatre.

They still know Him.

Because truth carries a certain sound.

And Christ Himself said:

“I am the Good Shepherd. I know My sheep, and My sheep know Me.”
— John 10:14

Jesus is the Good Shepherd.

He knows His sheep.

And His sheep, even now, still know Him.

A word is enough.

Don Kenobi
Don D’Baptist


#OldManInTheMolue
#MyFrancisEssays 
#MolueMonologue
#Truth
#Discernment
#FaithAndMercy
#FalseGospel #

Jesus, Liberalism, and the Crisis of Modern Conservatism

Jesus, Liberalism, and the Crisis of Modern Conservatism


Originally from May 1, 2022: A reflection on liberalism, intolerance, religion, personal choice, and the Parable of the Wheat and Tares, inspired by an interesting dialogue with Jude O, examining modern conservatism, freedom, decency, and the limits of imposing belief on others.


Tolerance and the Fear of Difference

A lot of tussling about and contradictions.

I think some guy just found out the meaning of “liberal,” a term he had hitherto used derogatorily, not realizing it was actually a good word.

Which is what illiberal folks do. They take your strengths and make them seem like weaknesses because they have no strengths that can stand on their own feet.

If the author has found out he has opposed those who harbor no ill will towards people like him, and who would even be more tolerant of their views if they would stop the mad quest for avenues to make their intolerance the law of the land, he should simply say so, and not tussle about trying mouth-to-mouth resuscitation on an untenable position.

Illiberalism stems from darkness, not enlightenment.

Let people be.

Your truth is not their truth.

Just let them be.


The Blazer, the Tee-Shirt, and the Need to Control Others

I know a guy who always wears a blazer or a waistcoat, even if he’s going nowhere.

I know another guy who criticizes him all the time behind his back. This second guy loves tee-shirts and shorts.

One feels insecure without a blazer. The other feels secure without one.

Why should that be a problem to you?

Let him be. He’s not trying to show off.

I was preaching tolerance.

The second guy was imposing his beliefs on the first guy, who was simply trying to find his way through the day.


The Politics of Decency

This post is dishonest, and I only respond because you tagged me.

Let’s flip the post on its head.

Why does the writer hold “liberals” accountable to the definition of the word, but not those who revel in their assault on decency?

There is such a thing as decency.

Trump is, was, and makes absolutely no effort to be a decent human being.

People who purport to be decent, yet revel in supporting such a fellow, cannot be separated from the indecency they support.

If you support a man who has no respect for facts or the truth, you are just as dirty a liar as he is, and good luck expecting “liberals” to support your indecency simply because the definition of “liberal” expects them to be tolerant.


Look in the Mirror

Look in the mirror.

If you are not tolerant of others who harbor no ill wishes towards you, what right have YOU to complain about their intolerance towards your intolerance?

Anyway, thanks for tagging me.

I rest.

#dk
#OldManInTheMolue


When Prejudice Demands Validation

Jude Adebosoye O responded thus:

“Whatever anyone’s truth may be, it is glaring in every man’s composition that pain is generally unwelcome. So also is anything that makes life unbearable for fellow humans.

And no matter how highly anyone may be placed, it is just natural for even the nonentity on the street to have his or her opinions of him or her, especially when such a ‘highly’ placed personage causes untold suffering and hardship to fellow human beings by being hypocritical, corrupt, and ISCARIOT.”

My Response to His Response

Jude Adebosoye Ogunade, great response to folks who have a problem with “liberals.”

I’m not sure if that was your intention, but it seems you oppose the note you tagged me on.

In my opinion, the victim mentality of those opposed to “liberals” is palpable, and sad to see.

I’m no psychologist, but it’s clear to me that it is an inner tussle, nothing to do with “liberals,” those comfortable with the principles and lifestyles they either live, or simply have no problem with.

I’ll go as far as saying it is a form of envy, sour grapes.

You hate homosexuals?

That is your choice.

But please do not stand at the imaginary doorway of your own morality and take offense at the fact that there are non-homosexuals who refuse to become guardians of that same morality, people who simply do not hate them.

You hate blacks, speaking now to white supremacists, and cannot understand, indeed are offended, that there are white folks who do not hate them as much as you do.

So, to make yourself feel better about the hatred you proudly wear, sometimes in the form of a red hat, you manufacture terms you can spit out and snigger with, labels meant to mock those who refuse to subscribe to your prejudice.

And so “liberal” becomes less a description and more a sneer.

Their “liberalness” thus becomes the problem, NOT your prejudice and jaundice.


Jesus, Liberalism, and the Conservatives of His Time

And all that bigotry supposedly is derived from the Bible.

Jesus was the GREATEST of all liberals, but you dare not suggest this to them!

You dare not mention that He very clearly despised the conservatives of His time.

No question in my mind what He would say to today’s self-acclaimed conservatives, if indeed He is the same “yesterday, today and forever.”

He would say to them plainly:

“I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!”

Hopefully some young “conservative” reads this and thinks a bit more deeply about the views they have been introduced to.

For the older ones, read the Parable of the Wheat and Tares.

I rest my case.

#dk


The Molue of Faith

If you genuinely have a change of heart, be humble.

Step back from the unreasonableness you made your mantra.

There is no shame in saying:

“I was wrong.”

Fact is, if God hates certain folks based on their preferences, or even their skin colour, if we are to believe the man who first propagated the false “Curse of Ham” theology, then perhaps the only business we truly have is this:

Intercede for them.

For clearly, according to you, they have fallen into disrepair with God and, as Scripture says:

“It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.”
Hebrews 10:31

And if God Himself “shall judge His people,” as the preceding verse says, who are we to pre-judge them?


Let Them All Grow Together

The Parable of the Wheat and Tares, Matthew 13:24–30, is a direct challenge to human prejudice.

Read it again.

And again.

It directly challenges the urge to violently purify society.

The servants want immediate separation.

The Master says no.

Why?

Because in trying to destroy the tares, they may uproot the wheat also.

This is one of the deepest warnings against ideological fanaticism and social persecution in the New Testament.

We are ALL in a race.

Run your race and let others run theirs.

Every man can jump on or jump off the Molue of religion, faith, or belief at any point in time they choose.

Do you question or berate a man who gets off at Anthony bus stop and ask why he does not follow the Molue to Race Course?

How about holding him down and forcing him to travel with you to the last bus stop because that’s where you want to go?

Can you do that?

You can’t?

You would be insane to do that.


Choice. Choice. Choice.

And it is that insanity, the insanity of imposing one’s choice on others, that “liberals” reject.

By the way, here is what the word liberal means:

  • Individual freedom

  • Freedom of speech and conscience

  • Tolerance of differing beliefs

  • Limits on state or religious coercion

  • Equality before the law

  • Protection of minorities

  • Skepticism of absolute authority

The word itself comes from the Latin liber, meaning “free.”

It is a choice and will always be a choice.

Choice. Choice. Choice.

It is amazing, and amusing, to see evangelicals talk about being oppressed in America, almost like slave masters complaining of oppression because they are prohibited by law from using the cudgel on the enslaved.

The sense of entitlement of these types beclouds their common sense.

Hey!

You can criticize a man’s choice, or try to bring him around to your point of view through the force of argument.

What so-called conservatives bemoan is the inability to force their argument on everyone else, and that, in their minds, is the law curtailing their religious liberties.

NOTHING is more evil.

NOTHING.


For the Third Time: The Parable of the Tares

For the third time, I refer to the Parable of the Tares.

“Let them all grow,” I paraphrase. “Perchance you destroy wheat as you try to rid the farm of the tares.”

The exact words of Scripture:

“The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?

But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.

Let both grow together until the harvest…”

Read it yourself:

Bible Gateway – Matthew 13:24–30


Case Closed

I rest my case.

Don Kenobi

#OldManInTheMolue
#MyFrancisEssays

Thursday, May 14, 2026

St. Charles de Foucauld: The Aristocrat Who Vanished Into the Sahara

 

Charles de Foucauld: The Aristocrat Who Vanished Into the Sahara



Don Kenobi: Discover with me the remarkable life of Charles de Foucauld, the French aristocrat who abandoned wealth and status to live among the poor in the Sahara, and why Pope Francis canonized him in 2022.

A Man Who Had Everything

Born into French nobility in 1858, Charles de Foucauld inherited wealth, status, and every advantage European society could offer. By his early twenties he had already become notorious for recklessness, indulgence, and excess.

A cavalry officer in the French army, he squandered much of his inheritance on pleasure, drifting through a life of parties, alcohol, gambling, and scandal.

Yet beneath the outward rebellion was a profound spiritual hunger.


The Journey Into Morocco

In 1883, during a time when Morocco was largely closed to Europeans, Foucauld disguised himself as a Jewish merchant and undertook a dangerous journey across North Africa.

Traveling through deserts and remote settlements, he encountered not only hardship and uncertainty, but also something that deeply unsettled him: the disciplined faith and devotion of ordinary Muslims living in conditions far harsher than his own.

That experience marked the beginning of an inner transformation.


The Desert Calling

Years later, after returning to France, he underwent a dramatic religious conversion and eventually entered monastic life.

But even the monastery was not austere enough for him.

Seeking complete simplicity, he chose to live among the poor in the Sahara Desert, first in Algeria and later among the Tuareg people deep in the wilderness.

He did not go there to conquer, rule, or become famous.

He went to disappear.

For years he lived in obscurity, praying, studying local languages, welcoming strangers, and attempting to embody what he believed was the hidden life of Christ, quiet, humble, and close to the forgotten.

He translated Tuareg poetry and compiled dictionaries that later became valuable anthropological records.

Ironically, almost nobody joined him during his lifetime.


A Life That Appeared to Fail

He died in 1916 during political unrest near his desert outpost, largely unknown to the wider world.

Yet after his death, his writings and example inspired numerous spiritual communities, missionaries, monks, and lay movements across the world.

Today, Charles de Foucauld is remembered not for power or achievement, but for radical humility.

His life remains a startling contradiction to modern culture: a man who possessed wealth, status, education, and adventure, yet concluded that the deepest human fulfillment was found in surrender, silence, and love.


Canonized by Pope Francis

More than a century later, on May 15, 2022, he was canonized by Pope Francis in St. Peter’s Square.

During the canonization homily, Pope Francis spoke of a holiness rooted not in spectacle, but in ordinary acts of love and hidden fidelity.

One line from the homily seemed almost written for Foucauld himself:

“Holiness does not consist in a few heroic gestures, but in many daily acts of love.”

The Pope warned Christians against religious vanity and spiritual self-importance, calling instead for humility, simplicity, and closeness to the forgotten, the very path Charles de Foucauld had embraced in the silence of the Sahara.

What deeply moved many observers was that Foucauld spent most of his life appearing to “fail.”

He founded no great institution during his lifetime.
He attracted almost no followers.
He died largely unknown.

And yet history remembered him.


Universal Brotherhood

Pope Francis especially admired Foucauld’s spirit of universal fraternity, his desire to live peacefully among Muslims, and his conviction that human beings must first encounter one another as brothers before anything else.

One of Foucauld’s own statements captures the essence of his life:

“I want to accustom all the inhabitants, Christians, Muslims, Jews… to regard me as their brother.”

Today, Charles de Foucauld stands as a startling contradiction to modern civilization.

A man who possessed wealth, education, status, and adventure, yet concluded that the deepest human fulfillment was found not in being admired, but in becoming small, hidden, and filled with love.

Notable Quotes by Charles de Foucauld

1. On Universal Brotherhood

“I want to accustom all the inhabitants, Christians, Muslims, Jews… to regard me as their brother.”

Perhaps the quote most associated with Charles de Foucauld, it captures his desire to live among people not as a conqueror or superior, but as a brother.


2. On Love as Evangelism

“One should go to people because one loves them.”

A profound summary of his approach to mission and human relationships. Not domination. Not argument first. Love first.


3. On Hidden Holiness

“Jesus took the lowest place so that no one could ever take it from Him.”

Foucauld was deeply fascinated by the hidden life of Christ in Nazareth, the ordinary, unnoticed years before public ministry.


4. On Surrender to God

“Father, I abandon myself into Your hands; do with me what You will.”

This became part of his famous “Prayer of Abandonment,” one of the most beloved modern Catholic prayers.


5. On Silence and Interior Life

“We must pass through the desert and spend time there to receive the grace of God.”

For Foucauld, the desert was not merely geography. It was spiritual emptiness, solitude, purification, and encounter with God.


6. On Becoming Small

“The moment I realized that God existed, I understood that I could do nothing else but live for Him alone.”

A striking reflection from a man who once lived for pleasure, status, and adventure, yet eventually renounced everything for a hidden life in the Sahara.

7. On Imitating Christ

“Our entire existence, our whole being, should preach the Gospel.”

For Charles de Foucauld, Christianity was not merely doctrine to be spoken, but a life to be embodied.


8. On Humility

“To love God, to love men, it is all one religion.”

A simple but powerful expression of his conviction that genuine love of God must overflow into love for others.


9. On the Hidden Life

“Nazareth can be lived anywhere.”

Foucauld believed the humble, hidden life of Jesus at Nazareth was not confined to one place or monastery. It could be lived in deserts, villages, cities, and ordinary labor.


10. On the Poor

“I cannot conceive of love without a need to suffer with and for the beloved.”

His spirituality was deeply tied to solidarity with the poor, the abandoned, and the forgotten.


11. On Simplicity

“Live as if you were to die tomorrow, but work as if you were to live forever.”

A tension between urgency and patience, detachment and responsibility.


12. On Trust in God

“Never be afraid to become a saint.”

A remarkably direct statement from a man whose own path to holiness began in failure, scandal, and spiritual emptiness.



Francis the Great | Love Is the Mightiest Force Upon the Earth


Francis the Great | Love Is the Mightiest Force Upon the Earth

A reflective essay on Pope Francis, love, faith, mortality, and spiritual victory. Don Kenobi explores why the passing of Pope Francis evokes not despair, but tears of triumph, hope, and recognition.

LOVE, NOT POWER

Pope Francis was not a conqueror in the worldly sense. He commanded no armies. Built no empire. Passed no legislation that altered the course of nations.

And yet, like a quiet river wearing down stone, he demonstrated again Christ’s unsettling truth:

Love is the mightiest force upon the earth.

Not power.
Not spectacle.
Not even history itself.

But love, quiet and stubborn, working its way patiently into the human heart.

Pope John Paul II was great. None can deny it. His life stood like a monument, visible from afar, unmistakable in its witness.

Yet Francis revealed something gentler, perhaps even more frightening to the proud: that tenderness may outlast triumphalism, and mercy may prove stronger than force.

WHEN A MAN WEEPS

A grown man enters the sanctuary, steady in step, composed in posture.

And then, without warning, something breaks within him.

Before he can gather himself, he is weeping.

Not the restrained tears of decorum, but the kind that rise unbidden, that refuse permission, that carry with them the weight of recognition.

He is weeping for Francis.

But these are not tears of despair.

We are not ignorant of the country to which he has gone.

There is no confusion here, no mourning without meaning.

These are the tears that come when long hope is finally crowned, when something believed, perhaps quietly, perhaps against the odds, is revealed to have been true all along.

THE TEARS OF VICTORY

It is the kind of weeping that follows victory.

The strange and sacred release that comes when the contest is finished and the outcome is no longer in doubt.

Like the roar that would rise if Arsenal F.C. were to lift the Champions League:
long awaited,
long imagined,
almost too much to hope for,
and then suddenly, undeniably real.

Not because the moment is loud,
but because it is complete.

So we weep,
not because he is lost,
but because he has won.

HE RAN THE RACE

He ran the race marked out for him.

He fought the good fight.

He kept the faith.

Not in abstraction.
Not in theory.

But in the slow, daily obedience that only Heaven fully records.

And now we, who watched from the grandstand of life,
who saw him stumble and rise,
who saw him press forward even when strength appeared spent,
now behold the splendor of his finish.

WE RISE TO OUR FEET

There is a stillness to such moments.

A reverent silence that falls across the soul.

And then, almost without instruction, we rise.

Not out of duty,
but out of recognition.

We rise to our feet.

With tears still streaming down our faces,
not from sorrow,
but from wonder.

From the sight of a life carried through to victory.

From the quiet astonishment that a soul,
frail and human,
could yet be made triumphant.

WELL DONE

And somewhere beyond the veil,
beyond applause,
beyond history,
beyond even memory itself,

comes the only words that finally matter:

“Well done, good and faithful servant.”


Don Kenobi


#OldManInTheMolue
#MyFrancisEssays
#LoveAlwaysWins
#VictoryInChrist
#FaithfulToTheEnd
#WellDoneGoodAndFaithfulServant

WHY CAN’T WE LIVE TOGETHER? Religion and the Failure of Restraint

 

Religion, Violence, and the Burden of Truth
Kukah’s Statement and the Problem With Denial


A 2022 reflection on religion, violence, blasphemy, fear, and the fragile work of coexistence in Nigeria — through the lenses of faith, law, grief, and human understanding - #dk

Who’s surprised this happened in Bishop Hassan Kukah’s jurisdiction?

And the first note he sends out begins with this:

“This has nothing to do with religion. Christians have lived peacefully with their Muslim brothers here in Sokoto over the years.

This matter must be treated as a criminal act and the law must take its course.”

Yes — it is a criminal act.

Yes — Muslims and Christians have largely lived peacefully together over the years, perhaps despite his own abdication of responsibility as the preeminent “shepherd of the flock” in Sokoto.

But no — it does not have nothing to do with religion.

I concede that this is probably a clumsy, albeit well-meaning, attempt to preserve the peace. And peace must be preserved. But in his view, saying it has nothing to do with religion somehow achieves that — even when the opposite is plainly the case.

You do not preserve peace through fire-fighting techniques.

You cannot be among those who heat up the polity and then rush ostentatiously to the conflagration with fire engines.

A stitch in time saves nine.

The Work of Building Religious Harmony

I have argued before that, straddling two civilizations — the Islamic and the Christian — Kukah’s responsibility is to foster mutual understanding between both worlds.

We cannot spend billions building railway lines through terrorism-prone territory and then expect providence alone to maintain security for us.

Similarly, we cannot sustain a volatile religious atmosphere in Nigeria and still expect providence to preserve political and religious harmony.

Like security infrastructure, religious harmony must be intentionally built — and constantly maintained.

Blasphemy, Law, and Coexistence

As one brilliant lawyer recently pointed out, blasphemy laws do not exist in our Constitution. Incidentally, he is currently defending a young man accused of blasphemy against Islam and has asked that the matter be properly tried in court once and for all.

In the meantime, those with the power to shape hearts and minds must step forward and do exactly that. Otherwise, coexistence becomes impossible.

Why I Left That Christian WhatsApp Group

I once left a WhatsApp forum where literally everyone was Christian.

In fact, 101% Christian — because one member who had been Muslim throughout our teenage years had since become a staunch Christian.

Why did I leave?

The undisguised bigotry.

Some of them were pastors. And I often found myself wondering — sometimes even saying, with my characteristic lack of tact:

“If this is truly what you believe, what exactly are you teaching those who look to you for spiritual guidance?”

“Why Can’t We Live Together?”

Timmy Thomas asked the question decades ago:

Why can’t we live together?

Tell me why, tell me why, tell me why…

Everybody wants to live together.

Listen to it yourself:
https://youtu.be/cFU-FJzPE80

Grief, Empathy, and the Limits of Words

I have seen many angry remarks from Christians in recent days.

And I can only imagine the trauma, terror, fear, and anguish experienced by that young lady and her family. I have tried to put myself in her shoes — to imagine the horror she must have felt as she…

I have not watched the video, and I will not.

No words can adequately assuage the grief of her loved ones.

My only hope is that, as she passed from this life into the next, there was an outstretched hand lifting her upward and drawing her into an embrace.

Victor Wooten, God, and Forgiveness

Yesterday, I listened to a song by Victor Wooten titled I Saw God. I will write about him sometime soon. He is one of the most fascinating people I have encountered in a while.

In that song, he asks how he could ever forgive those he despised.

And God — she — answered:

“When you see me, you’ll know how.”

Love, Fear, and Abraham’s God

Jesus said the greatest commandments are these:

  1. Love the Lord your God with all your heart.

  2. Love your neighbour as yourself.

I should probably stop here, otherwise it would become necessary to explore the uncomfortable possibility that those two commandments can sometimes appear to clash.

It is complicated.

Very.

Did Abraham love God?

And would he kill his only son to please the God he loved?

Or did Abraham fear God?

Is there a difference between love and fear?

And does the distinction matter?

#DeepSigh

I rest my case.

— Don Kenobi (#dk)
#MoluePassenger
#OldManInTheMolue

Tuesday, May 12, 2026

The Cult of Political Improvisation: Tell Us the Ground Game...


No Manifesto. No Structure. No Ground Game.

Hope Is Not a Strategy: A critique of improvisational politics in Nigeria, examining leadership, political structure, INEC, movement-building, and why hope alone is not a strategy for national transformation.


The Cult of Improvisation

No manifesto.
No structure.
No policies.
No political party machinery.
No mission statement.

Yet we are told this is how to win a presidency?

Let us even assume he has a path to victory.

Then what exactly is being taught to Nigerian youths?

That hope is a strategy?

That they do not need to commit time, brain, and brawn to anything, institution or task, but should simply jump from one platform to another while “pursuing their manifest destiny”?

Are we teaching them that cohesion does not matter?

That every ship should be abandoned the moment disagreements arise?

What is the lesson here?

That men like Nelson Mandela, Barack Obama, or even Julius Caesar, who painstakingly built movements, structures, alliances, and political machines, simply chose to do it the hard way because they were not smart enough to jump ship when disagreements arose?

I cannot support such a model of politics.

Nor a candidate who plays to our dysfunction rather than rises above it, or shows us a way to succeed within this miasma of disorder.


The Same Playbook

This is the same playbook we saw leading into the 2023 elections.

The same playbook.

Nothing appears to have been learned from the loss of an election many supporters insist should have been won easily.

Of course, the answer remains: “If not for INEC eh?”

Fine.

But what has changed?

INEC is still there.

Still controversial.

Still distrusted by millions.

Still in charge of the next election.


Momentum Matters

A serious candidate, in my view, would already be working day and night to build a vision so compelling, and a movement so disciplined, that the people themselves would make it unmistakably clear they were prepared to defend that mandate with vigilance, sacrifice, and organization.

We saw something similar in 2015.

President Goodluck Jonathan postponed the elections in an attempt to slow the momentum of Muhammadu Buhari and the APC machine.

But the momentum had become too obvious to ignore.

INEC saw the handwriting on the wall and, for the first time in Nigerian history, a sitting president was defeated.

Even then, it took a former military ruler with a long-cultivated reputation for integrity to achieve it.

Ironically, many Nigerians opposed to him at the time mocked the idea of integrity itself.

“Integrity is not enough.”

Some even argued that “a little corruption,” like wine, was good “for the stomach’s sake.”

Now suddenly:

Integrity is everything?

A little corruption is no longer acceptable?


Buhari’s Real Failure

Did Buhari fail?

In many respects, yes.

But one of his greatest failures was this: once elected, he turned away from the structure and coalition that helped bring him to power.

Power became centralized around himself.

And that, I fear, is exactly what happens when movements are built around emotion rather than enduring organization.


If You Are Running, Then Run

Politics is not performance art. (As citizens of a certain major nation are currently finding out.)

The troubling part is this:

The man whose name I hardly need mention does not even appear to be actively trying to win.

And that is what drives me mad.

Have Nigerians not suffered enough?

If you are running for office, then run.

What is all this theatrical ambiguity?

What is all this unseriousness?

Politics is not performance art.

The disgraced Giuliani tried a similar strategy in the United States.

“Wait till you see my ground game in Florida.”

HE repeated endlessly to supporters and journalists alike.

The Florida primaries came, he collapsed completely....

Completely.


What Is the Ground Game?

So the question remains:

What is the ground game?

Ten months to an election, where is the visible machinery?

And please, spare us the excuse that strategy cannot be revealed because “the opposition will steal it.”

We heard similar explanations in 2022 regarding the absence of a manifesto, only for one to emerge later that many critics considered incoherent and underdeveloped.

Also, please spare us the “the people will defend their mandate” excuse that was used to mask the lack of leadership, organization, and political preparation leading into the 2022/2023 elections.


Nigeria Deserves Seriousness

We all want change.

We all want a better Nigeria.

But we must build movements future generations can learn from.

Not more chaos.

Not more improvisation.

Not more “cherey-werey” politics masquerading as strategy.

Nigeria deserves seriousness.


Tell Us. Show Us. Prove It.

What is your strategy?

What is your ground game?

What exactly are the leaders of tomorrow supposed to learn from this approach?

Because hope alone is not enough.

Movements require discipline.

Victory requires structure.

Nations require seriousness.

Case not rested.

Obi Akaraiwe | Don Kenobi
Co-Founder, BigAgendaAfrica

A Homily on Family, Covenant, and the Work of God

God Thinks in Generations

The Sacred Work of Family

A powerful homily on Abraham, family covenant, generational purpose, unity, faith, and the work of God. Exploring how families, shared vision, and covenant shape destiny, legacy, and spiritual continuity across generations.


“For I Know Him…”

Abraham was not chosen by God merely because he would become wealthy, influential, or the father of many nations.

He was chosen because God said:

“For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the Lord…”
— Genesis 18:19

That is the covenant.

Not merely land.
Not merely blessing.
Not merely prosperity.

Family.

God trusted Abraham with a future because He trusted Abraham with a household.


God Thinks in Generations

This is something many people do not fully understand: when God sees a man or woman who can raise children to love Him, fear Him, walk with Him, and continue His ways into the next generation, Heaven pays attention.

Because God thinks in generations.

The covenant was never merely about Abraham.

It was about Isaac.
Then Jacob.
Then the tribes.
Then generations yet unborn.

And so the family becomes sacred territory.


The Mystery of Family Unity

This is why unity in the family matters so deeply before God.

When husband and wife walk together in purpose, even in matters of work, business, and responsibility, God honors it.

And when children work alongside their parents in truth, discipline, love, and purpose, building better things together, something powerful begins to happen, both in the things of the Spirit and in matters of increase.

Because unity reflects His nature.

And when a family works in genuine unity, Heaven responds.

God delights in households that build together, especially when the work of their hands brings glory to His name, improves the condition of humanity, eases suffering, reduces needless toil, and creates more space for reflection, worship, learning, beauty, and contemplation of divine truth.

God loves wisdom applied.

He is the God of knowledge, especially knowledge applied with wisdom.

And when a family pursues noble ideas together, with humility, discipline, creativity, and love, His subtle hand often begins to appear in ways difficult to explain.

Do not cancel one another out.

Family, cultivate the habit of thinking together.
Discuss businesses together.
Discuss ideas together.
Discuss creative projects together, whether in film, storytelling, innovation, teaching, craftsmanship, or service.

Remember: such ventures are not merely about making money.

Money is secondary.

The deeper purpose is this:

  • That the family learns to build together

  • To sacrifice together

  • To dream together

  • To labor together

  • To trust God together

Because there is a mystery in shared purpose.

A house divided weakens itself.
But a house united around righteousness becomes difficult to stop.


Covenant Beyond Wealth

Even in the world, we see examples of families building together across generations.

Entire dynasties have emerged because fathers, mothers, sons, and daughters moved with one vision.

Even in secular history, examples abound. Consider families like the Rothschilds, who built multi-generational influence through extraordinary unity of purpose.

How much more should the people of God understand this principle?

For if people who do not know God can build lasting structures through discipline, unity, and generational thinking, what could happen if families truly walked with God in covenant?

What could happen if love, prayer, discipline, creativity, wisdom, and work were passed from father to child, mother to daughter, generation to generation?


Why the Family Is Attacked

That is why the enemy attacks the family so fiercely.

Because Satan understands covenant.

He understands that if he can break the relationship between parent and child, he interrupts transmission.

If a father cannot walk with his children, teach them, guide them, pray with them, build with them, then something precious is interrupted.

The fear of God is not transferred by sermons alone.

It is transferred through life lived together.

Children learn worship by watching worship.
They learn prayer by hearing prayer.
They learn sacrifice by seeing sacrifice.
They learn discipline by observing discipline.

And so the enemy targets the family because he understands something many believers forget:

Destroy the family, and you weaken the next generation before it even begins.


The Deeper Meaning of Covenant

God desires to populate the earth with people who know Him.

Generation after generation after generation.

That is the deeper meaning behind covenant.

And perhaps this is why many people remain unfulfilled.

Not because they lack money.
Not because they lack talent.

But because fulfillment comes from participating in what God Himself desires to accomplish in the earth.

A man may succeed publicly and still feel empty privately because his true assignment was larger than personal achievement.


When Work Becomes Ministry

Sometimes the real joy is found in building something that serves others.

Something that gathers people.
Something that lifts the next generation.

Even creative work can become ministry.

A film can become ministry.
A story can become ministry.
A business can become ministry.
A shared family project can become ministry.

Not merely because it earns income, but because it creates meaning, responsibility, discipline, and shared vision.

Imagine millions of ordinary people contributing small amounts to help build something meaningful together.

Not merely consumers, but participants.

Not merely spectators, but builders.

That spirit itself reflects something holy:

People gathering around shared purpose.


Conclusion

And perhaps that is what many of us are truly searching for.

Not merely success.

But covenant.
Purpose.
Meaning.
Continuity.
Family.

And the joy of building something together under God.

May I rise?

Don Kenobi

#OldManInTheMolue 
#MyFrancisEssays 
#MolueMonologues

Lamentation For Nigeria's Poor: Poverty, Violence, and the Failure of Economic Imagination

  Lamentation For Nigeria's Poor Poverty, Violence, and the Failure of Economic Imagination A reflective essay on poverty, corruption, v...