Monday, April 27, 2026

The Loss Of Discernment In Christendom: When Gullibility Becomes A Choice...

The Loss of Discernment: When Gullibility Becomes a Choice

At what point does believing lies become a moral failure?A reflection on truth, discernment, and responsibility in Christian life 


I. The Real Issue Is Not Gullibility

Gullibility is not a mortal sin.
But don’t relax too quickly.

Because what the Catechism of the Catholic Church does not list explicitly, it still addresses indirectly, and sometimes more seriously.

The issue is not gullibility.
The issue is the refusal to discern.


II. From Weakness to Complicity

A person can be deceived.
That is human.

But a person who chooses not to question,
who outsources their judgment,
who refuses to examine what they are told,

has crossed a line.

Not into error,
but into responsibility for error.

At that point, gullibility stops being a weakness.
It becomes participation in falsehood.


III. The Sin Beneath the Surface

Catholic tradition would not call this “gullibility.”
It would call it:

  • A failure of prudence

  • A neglect of reason, which is itself a gift from God

  • A quiet surrender to falsehood dressed as truth

Scripture does not treat this lightly.

The Bible repeatedly warns, not just about evil, but about deception:

  • False prophets

  • Wolves in sheep’s clothing

  • Teachers who tickle ears

Which raises a harder question:

If deception is everywhere,
what does it mean to refuse to discern?


IV. When Gullibility Becomes Dangerous

Gullibility becomes spiritually dangerous when it is:

  • Comfortable – you believe what flatters you

  • Convenient – you accept what fits your tribe

  • Selective – you reject truth when it is inconvenient

At that point, it is no longer innocence.
It is alignment.


V. Christendom’s Quiet Crisis

A people can be trained
not just to believe lies,
but to prefer them.

To be suspicious of truth.
To distrust decency.
To hate what is good.

Not because they are evil,
but because they have stopped examining,
stopped testing,
stopped thinking.


VI. The Moral Turning Point

In Catholic thought, the danger is not that you were misled.

The danger is that you chose not to see.

Because truth is not hidden from those who seek it.
But it is often invisible to those who have already decided
what they want to believe.


VII. The Molue Question

So the Old Man would lean forward,
look at the bus,
and ask quietly:

If Scripture warned you about deception…
If reason was given to you…
If truth is still available…

Then at what point
does gullibility stop being misfortune…
and become a choice?


VIII. From Principle to Practice

Discernment is not tested in theory.
It is tested in what we see,
who we judge,
and what we choose to believe.


IX. A Case in Point

Barack Obama

He is a credit to his race: the human race.

Ever graceful. Ever in pursuit of:

“whatsoever things are true… honest… just… pure… lovely… of good report.”

If that sounds familiar, it should.

Sadly, many who disagree most vociferously about him will be Africans, not African Americans.

Many still operate under a kind of theological colonialism.

Their colonial masters?

Figures like Oral Roberts and Kenneth Copeland.

Over decades, this influence has reshaped African Christianity.

The result is subtle but devastating:

Jesus displaced.
Mammon enthroned.

And from that substitution flows the Prosperity Gospel.


X. Evangelicalism and the Reckoning to Come

Evangelicalism will answer to God for many things.
One of them will be Barack Obama.

It must reckon with:

  • How outrage drowned out charity

  • How suspicion was baptized as discernment

  • How it became comfortable with Donald Trump


XI. Was There Ever Such a Time?

Was there ever a time when Christian witness came first?

Or have we imagined it?

“The more you look, the less you see.”

The more you look for Christianity in much of what passes today as Evangelicalism,
the less you see.


XII. I Was There

I am not speaking as an outsider.

T. D. Jakes was my pope.
Joel Osteen my archbishop.

I was there.

And I watched something shift.
Or perhaps, I watched an illusion collapse.


XIII. Did Something Shift?

Many believe something changed.

No.

Perhaps we were simply deceived from the beginning.


XIV. The Fork in the Road

Two gates stand before us:

  • One wide, polished, inviting

  • One narrow, broken, almost hidden

Christ’s words are clear:

The wide path leads to destruction.

Yet many choose it anyway.


XV. The Warning We Ignored

Scripture is blunt:

“Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners.”

Association shapes destiny.

And deception, once embraced, reshapes the soul.


XVI. A Case Study: God’s Generals

God’s Generals

A book that turned flawed men into near-saints.

Human weakness was not acknowledged.
It was canonized.

And many followed blindly.


XVII. The Real Problem

Power has become more urgent than witness.
Influence more urgent than integrity.
Access more urgent than truth.


XVIII. So, Is Participation in Falsehood a Mortal Sin?

According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, a sin is mortal if three conditions are met:

  • Grave matter

  • Full knowledge

  • Deliberate consent

So the real question is not:

Is participation in falsehood a sin?

It is:

When does it rise to the level of grave moral responsibility?


Grave Matter

Spreading falsehood knowingly becomes grave when:

  • It leads others into error

  • It distorts faith or moral truth

  • It causes real harm


Full Knowledge

If a person:

  • Is genuinely misled

  • Lacks formation or education

  • Is operating in confusion

Then the sin may be real, but not mortal.

But once the person recognizes the falsehood and continues anyway,
the situation changes.


Deliberate Consent

This is the decisive line.

There is a difference between:

  • Being deceived

  • Choosing to remain in deception

If someone:

  • Avoids truth because it is inconvenient

  • Prefers comforting lies

  • Defends what they know is false

They are no longer merely misled.
They are participating.


Where It Becomes Mortal

Participation in falsehood becomes a mortal sin when:

  • The falsehood involves serious moral or spiritual harm

  • The person knows it is false, or strongly suspects it

  • The person freely chooses to support or spread it

At that point, it aligns with:

  • Sin against truth

  • Failure of prudence

  • Cooperation with evil


XIX. The Final Molue Question

At what point does gullibility stop being weakness
and become consent?

At what point does deception stop being something done to you
and become something you have chosen?

May Jesus have mercy on us all.





Don Kenobi
#OldManInTheMolue | #MyFrancisEssays | #MolueMonOLogUes



No comments:

Post a Comment

The Loss Of Discernment In Christendom: When Gullibility Becomes A Choice...

The Loss of Discernment: When Gullibility Becomes a Choice At what point does believing lies become a moral failure?A reflection on truth, d...