Wednesday, July 8, 2026

The Shepherd never teaches His sheep to hate

 

The Shepherd never teaches His sheep to hate

A television interview becomes a searching conversation about truth, persecution, corruption, false shepherds, and what it truly means to follow Christ. 

An excerpt from The Monologuist by Don Kenobi.


Under the Lights

The studio was brighter than Timotheus imagined.

Banks of white lights hung overhead, bleaching every colour into something slightly unreal. Cameras glided silently across polished tracks. A live audience filled the tiered seating, their anticipation amplified by the quiet choreography of floor managers, technicians and producers counting down to airtime.

Everything about television suggested certainty.

Timotheus felt none.

He sat between two men who represented very different worlds.

To his left was the host—a seasoned journalist whose reputation had been built asking questions that left politicians searching for exits.

To his right sat Father Gabriel, an articulate Catholic priest with an easy smile, a sharp mind, and a collar that immediately communicated authority.

Timotheus carried neither notes nor Bible.

Only a glass of water.

Behind them, a giant monitor flickered to life.

The audience watched images of crowded Molues weaving through Lagos traffic. Then came clips of university students laughing around him after lectures. Workers standing in circles on dusty street corners. Strangers listening as though ordinary conversations had somehow become sermons.

Finally, the recording settled on Timotheus himself.

"...Where is the profit?"

The clip ended.

Applause filled the studio.

The host smiled.

"So," he said, almost casually, "who exactly is Timotheus?"

He glanced at his card.

"A mathematics teacher?"

"A preacher?"

"A disappointed seminarian?"

The audience laughed.

Timotheus simply smiled.

Nothing more.

The host leaned forward.

"Let's begin there."

"You applied to become a Catholic priest."

"Twice."

"You were rejected."

"Twice."

He allowed the words to linger.

"Is everything we're seeing today..."

"...simply revenge?"

The audience fell silent.

Timotheus studied him for a long moment.

Then he nodded ever so slightly.

"Perhaps."

A collective gasp swept across the studio.

Even Father Gabriel turned to look at him.

Then Timotheus burst into laughter.

Not polite laughter.

Real laughter.

The audience joined him.

When he finally recovered, wiping tears from the corners of his eyes, he shrugged.

"Maybe."

The laughter returned, louder this time.

The host smiled despite himself.

He had not expected his first attack to dissolve into comedy.


A Priest Without Permission

"So now," the host continued, "instead of preaching inside churches..."

"...you preach in classrooms."

"On buses."

"On street corners."

He looked directly at Timotheus.

"Almost like..."

"...a priest without permission."

Timotheus considered the description.

Then shrugged.

"Perhaps God enjoys unusual architecture."

The audience laughed again.

Even Father Gabriel smiled.

Only briefly.

The host turned another page.

"You stopped attending Mass."

Timotheus looked genuinely puzzled.

"Who told you that?"

The journalist hesitated.

"Didn't you?"

Timotheus shook his head.

It was at that moment the audience began noticing something unusual.

Timotheus never answered questions directly.

He dismantled them.


Sundays

"No," he said.

"I attend church three..."

"...sometimes four..."

"...times every week."

A murmur travelled through the audience.

"Really?" the host asked.

"Yes."

"I simply avoid going on Sundays."

Laughter rolled across the studio.

Father Gabriel remained expressionless.

"You avoid..."

"...sermons?"

"I go," Timotheus replied quietly, "for an encounter with the Holy Spirit."

"To renew my Creed."

"To pray the Hail Mary."

He paused.

"Sometimes..."

"...sometimes silence teaches better than microphones."

The laughter disappeared.

Even those who disagreed found themselves listening.

Father Gabriel finally spoke.

"Then surely..."

"...you're still Catholic."

Timotheus smiled warmly.

"Entirely."

The host frowned.

"Yet many Catholics accuse you of attacking the Church."

Timotheus reflected before answering.

"No."

"I attack darkness."

He paused.

"Sometimes..."

"...darkness wears a collar."

The audience shifted uneasily.

Father Gabriel straightened in his chair.

"That's unfair."

"Priests have devoted their lives to Christ."

Timotheus nodded before the sentence had even finished.

"Many have."

"Some are saints."

"Some carried Christianity upon bleeding shoulders."

"They gave us hospitals."

"Schools."

"Universities."

"Orphanages."

"Some died anonymous deaths serving Christ."

He turned towards Father Gabriel.

"They deserve monuments."

For the first time that evening, Father Gabriel visibly relaxed.

Then Timotheus quietly added,

"Others..."

"...deserve investigation."

Silence returned to the studio.

Not hostile.

Reflective.

It lingered long enough for everyone to recognise that he had not spoken those words in anger.

Only sorrow.


The Gift

The host sensed the interview changing.

He leaned forward.

"Are you saying..."

"...the Church failed you?"

Timotheus smiled.

"No."

"The Church gave me something priceless."

"What?"

"Rejection."

Even Father Gabriel blinked.

"You're grateful..."

"...for rejection?"

"Very."

Timotheus folded his hands.

"Rejection gave me distance."

"Distance gave me perspective."

"Perspective..."

"...gave me a bird's-eye view."

The host leaned forward.

"A bird's-eye view..."

"...of what?"

Timotheus did not answer immediately.

Instead, he looked directly into Camera One.

The small red tally light glowed steadily.

"The Body of Christ."

He paused.

"From above..."

"...patterns become visible."

"Light..."

"...and shadow."

"Truth..."

"...and performance."

No one interrupted him.

Not even the host.

For reasons none of them could quite explain, the interview had stopped feeling like an interview.

It had become something else.

A conversation in which everyone, including the interviewer, had quietly become a student.

The hardest questions, however, were still waiting.


The Hardest Question

The host sat back in his chair.

For a moment, he simply watched Timotheus.

Then, almost deliberately, he changed direction.

"Let's talk about persecution."

The atmosphere shifted.

On the screen behind them appeared images of burned churches, grieving families, and villages scarred by violence.

The audience grew quiet.

"Churches burned."

"Christians murdered."

"Families displaced."

He looked directly at Timotheus.

"Many people call this Christian genocide."

"Why won't you?"

Applause swept through the studio.

Timotheus did nothing.

He simply waited.

He had learned long ago that applause often interrupted thought.

Only after the room had become silent again did he answer.

"Because truth..."

"...must never become a casualty..."

"...even while defending truth."

The silence that followed was heavier than the applause.

The host frowned.

"That's not an answer."

"It is the only answer."

"Are Christians suffering?"

"Absolutely."

"Then why hesitate?"

Timotheus folded his hands.

"Because Christianity was born suffering..."

"...not escaping it."

He spoke almost gently now.

"The first Christians were never promised safety."

"They were fed to lions."

"Burned alive."

"Crucified."

"Some upside down."

"They were hunted across an empire like rabid dogs."

"They worshipped in catacombs."

The host interrupted.

"What's a catacomb?"

Timotheus smiled.

"An underground cemetery."

"The early Christians buried their dead there."

"They also worshipped there whenever it became too dangerous to worship above ground."

He paused.

"In one place..."

"...they preserved both memory..."

"...and hope."


Define the Word

Father Gabriel leaned forward.

"Fine."

"Are Christians being persecuted in Nigeria?"

"Yes or no?"

Timotheus smiled almost sympathetically.

"Before I answer..."

"...we must first agree on what persecution means."

Father Gabriel shook his head.

"No."

"Yes or no."

Timotheus ignored the interruption.

"In the first three centuries, Christians suffered repeated waves of persecution under Nero..."

"...Decius..."

"...and Diocletian."

"Yes or no."

For the first time that evening, Timotheus raised his voice.

Not angrily.

Precisely.

"Persecution meant being arrested simply for refusing to sacrifice to the Roman gods."

"Being arrested for refusing to acknowledge the emperor's divinity."

"Losing property."

"Losing employment."

"Imprisonment."

"Torture."

"Public execution."

He paused.

"Beheading."

"Crucifixion."

"Burning."

"Being thrown into an arena before cheering crowds."

The studio had become motionless.

Father Gabriel refused to surrender.

"Yes..."

"...or no?"

Timotheus continued as though he had not spoken.

"The Romans called Christians..."

"...atheists."

A ripple of surprise passed through the audience.

"Imagine that."

"Atheists."

"Not because they believed in no god..."

"...but because they refused to worship Rome's gods."

He looked towards Father Gabriel.

"The principal accusation was never..."

"'You worship Jesus.'"

"It was..."

"'You refuse to worship the gods who protect Rome.'"

Again the priest interrupted.

"Yes..."

"...or no?"

Timotheus took one slow step towards him.

"Very well."

"Let us use the Roman definition."

"Are Christians in Nigeria arrested by the State for refusing to sacrifice to other gods?"

"Yes or no, Father Gabriel?"

No answer.

"Are Christians imprisoned by the constituted authorities for refusing to acknowledge another religion's lordship?"

No answer.

"Are Christians stripped of their property..."

"...their employment..."

"...their civil rights..."

"...because they refuse to worship another god?"

Again...

silence.

Father Gabriel smiled.

"Why did you stop?"

"Why not ask whether Christians are publicly beheaded in Northern Nigeria?"

Timotheus never broke eye contact.

"By the constituted authorities?"

"Or by criminals?"

"There is a difference."

"A profound difference."

"And if we lose that distinction..."

"...we lose the meaning of the word."

His voice softened.

"I am not frightened by marauding criminals wielding machetes and axes against Christians trying to live in peace."

"They are wolves."

"Without question."

"But they are wolves..."

"...outside the sheepfold."

No applause followed.

Only thought.

Wolves

Elsewhere, the nation had stopped moving.

In a crowded beer parlour, untouched bottles warmed on the tables as every eye remained fixed upon the television.

In a barber's shop, electric clippers hung motionless in mid-air while a customer sat with only half his haircut completed.

Inside a seminary common room, young seminarians leaned closer to the screen.

No one was taking notes anymore.

Back in the studio, the host's voice had almost become a whisper.

"Then..."

"...what frightens you?"

Timotheus answered immediately.

"Corruption..."

"...within the Church."

"The wolves within."

He looked slowly around the audience.

"Outside wolves rarely destroy Christianity."

"It is the wolves inside..."

"...the wolves in shepherds' clothing."

The room shifted uneasily.

Father Gabriel folded his arms.

"Are you calling priests wolves?"

Timotheus turned towards him.

His expression carried neither anger nor accusation.

Only sadness.

"Some."

"Not all."

"Never all."

"But enough."

"Enough that Christ warned us."

"Not once."

"Repeatedly."

He allowed the words to settle.

Then quietly continued.

"A wolf outside the sheepfold..."

"...looks like a wolf."

"A wolf inside..."

"...usually carries a Bible."

No one moved.

Even the host had stopped interrupting.

Somehow...

without anyone noticing exactly when...

Timotheus had taken control of the room.


The Shepherd

The host glanced at his notes.

Then quietly placed them face down upon the table.

For the first time that evening, he asked a question he had not prepared.

"May I ask you something..."

"...not as a journalist..."

"...but as a Christian?"

The audience became perfectly still.

Father Gabriel noticed immediately.

This was dangerous.

The interview had changed.

The journalist was no longer interviewing.

He was searching.

Timotheus nodded.

"Of course."

A long silence followed.

Then—

"How..."

"...do I know..."

"...I'm following the Shepherd..."

"...and not merely..."

"...someone speaking about Him?"

The room froze.

Father Gabriel closed his eyes.

He knew this answer would outlive the programme.

Timotheus reached quietly for his glass of water.

He took a sip.

Placed it gently back on the table.

Then turned.

Not towards the host.

Towards Camera One.

Towards millions of people watching at home.

When he finally spoke, his voice was almost tender.

"The Shepherd..."

"...never teaches His sheep..."

"...to hate."

Silence.

"Start there."

He paused once more.

Almost as though the final thought had arrived unexpectedly.

"Any shepherd..."

"...who teaches his flock to hate..."

"...is merely speaking about Jesus."

"He is not following Jesus."

"And he is certainly not..."

"...leading his sheep..."

"...towards the Lord."


After the Broadcast

Across the country, nobody spoke.

In the barber's shop.

The beer parlour.

The convent.

The seminary.

Even in a small mosque, where a television murmured quietly in one corner, no one reached for the remote.

In a yellow Molue rattling through Lagos traffic, the conductor forgot to call for passengers.

The old bus simply kept moving.

Silently.


The Next Morning

The newsroom was unusually quiet.

Editors replayed the interview without saying a word.

Finally, the presenter looked up.

"Who is he?"

An editor shrugged.

"I'll find out."

He glanced at a sheet of paper lying on his desk.

"I hear...he's a janitor."


An excerpt from The Monologuist by Don Kenobi.


An Unexpected Farewell Address (Birth of the Monologuist)

Birth Of The Monologuist: 
An Unexpected Farewell Address...

What if the most important lesson at graduation wasn't about success, but about who success is making you become?
An excerpt from The Monologuist by Don Kenobi.

The graduating class expected another farewell speech.

Another catalogue of motivational clichés. Another polite reminder to work hard, dream big, and represent the university well.

Instead, they received something entirely different.

The hall was modest—not because the university could not have found a larger venue, but because no one imagined many students would attend. Yet enough came. Enough to fill the seats. Enough to create that peculiar silence that settles over a room when people sense they are about to hear something they did not know they needed.

Timotheus walked slowly to the front.

He carried no notes. No PowerPoint. No carefully rehearsed gestures.

Public speaking had never interested him as performance. He distrusted performance. Truth, he believed, should never have to compete with theatre.

He rested both hands lightly on the lectern and surveyed the room. There was no urgency in him. No attempt to impress. Only the quiet confidence of a teacher thinking aloud.

"I shall speak today," he began, "about false gain, dangerous associations, and misplaced value."

The room straightened almost instinctively.

He paused.

"For those who prefer titles..."

A faint smile crossed his face.

"...the title is Where Is the Profit?"

Soft laughter rippled through the hall before disappearing as quickly as it had come.

He allowed the silence to settle once more before continuing.

The Wrong Question

"One of the most dangerous ideas you will carry into the world is the belief that success belongs only to people with the right connections."

His voice remained quiet, forcing the room to lean towards him rather than the other way around.

"You will be told that life is about knowing somebody. That your future depends upon attaching yourself to powerful people."

He shook his head gently.

"Not every connection is a bridge."

A pause.

"Some are traps."

The sentence settled heavily over the audience.

"You stop asking the most important question."

His eyes moved slowly across the rows of students.

"'What am I becoming?'"

"And instead you begin asking, 'Who can I attach myself to?'"

He waited.

"The day you trade becoming for attaching..."

"...you begin to disappear."

No one shifted in their seats.

"That is how a man loses himself."

The Slow Mathematics of Failure

He stepped away from the lectern, not dramatically, but almost absent-mindedly, as though the thought itself required movement.

"People rarely fail all at once."

"They fail by degrees."

"A small compromise."

"A convenient lie."

"A favour accepted."

"A principle postponed."

"A truth ignored because telling it became too expensive."

His hands folded loosely behind his back.

"And before long..."

"...they no longer recognise the person making those decisions."

The speech was no longer following any outline he had prepared. Something deeper had taken over. He had intended to offer advice. Instead, he was revealing the architecture of his own life.

The Names We Accept

"There is another danger," he continued.

"The names people give you."

"Ordinary."

"Average."

"Unlucky."

"Unsuccessful."

"Not leadership material."

He smiled sadly.

"You hear those names often enough..."

"...and one day they stop describing you."

"They begin recruiting you."

"You begin cooperating with the identity someone else assigned to you."

His eyes drifted briefly towards the window before returning to the students.

"You become exactly what the world expected."

The hall was astonishingly still.

Not a phone.

Not a whisper.

Not even the restless movement that usually accompanies long speeches.

The students were no longer listening to advice.

They were listening to a man think.

Timotheus realised, almost with surprise, that he had wandered far beyond the farewell speech he had intended to give.

The Final Question

He lowered his head for a moment, gathering the scattered threads of his thoughts.

Then he looked up once more.

"So I leave you with only one question."

His voice was softer now.

"Whenever the world offers you profit..."

"...ask first..."

"What will it cost me..."

"...to become?"

Silence.

Not polite silence.

Reflective silence.

The kind that follows recognition.

For several long seconds, no one applauded.

Many were too occupied by their own thoughts.

General Knowledge Class

Timotheus cleared his throat.

The spell broke.

For the first time that afternoon, he smiled.

"Oh..."

"If anyone would like to remain for a slightly more advanced lesson in Engineering Mathematics..."

He looked around the room with mock seriousness.

"...you are most welcome."

Another beat.

"Our General Knowledge class is now officially over."

The hall erupted.

Laughter first.

Then applause.

Long.

Warm.

Unforced.

Some students rose and left.

Many remained exactly where they were.

No one announced a second session. There was no invitation, no registration, no programme. Yet from that afternoon onward, students lingered after every lecture.

Without intending to, Timotheus had founded something.

Not a movement.

Not a ministry.

A tradition.

The Monologuist had arrived.

He was the last person to realise it.

When he finally did, he quietly reversed the order of his lectures.

The monologue came first.

Engineering came second.

That way, those who had come only for the stories could leave without guilt...

...and those who remained would stay for the mathematics.


Excerpted from The Monologuist

Don Kenobi | #MolueStudios

Tuesday, July 7, 2026

What Nigeria Must Learn from California’s Agriculture Model

 

What Nigeria Must Learn from California’s Agriculture Model

Nigeria possesses twice the land mass of California
and far greater ecological diversity,
yet it generates only a fraction of the agricultural value.

This is not a story about climate alone. It is a story about management.
About irrigation. About processing. About institutions.

It's a story about how Nigeria’s untapped 36.9 million hectares
can be strategically activated, disciplined, integrated,and transformed
to build an agriculture economy on the scale of California’s.

Bring out your writing pads....

Folding his arms across his chest, he spoke without emotion: “Nigeria holds two Californias in her palm,”

He started, voice a low and steady hum, “With soil more varied, more rain.... Yet for all the emerald richness Nigeria generates only a fraction California's agricultural value"

He stopped abruptly, leaving his words to hang in the air.

“For those joining for the first time, I’m Sanni, Professor of Thermodynamics.”

Editor:

Remember him?

The professor who began each class with a 30-minute digression, during which he spoke about any subject he pleased? Hundreds of students, even journalists and professors, attended those sessions. They only left when he rang his little bell, signalling that the Thermodynamics lecture was about to begin. As the crowd grew, the university assigned him the amphitheatre behind Oduduwa Hall.

That's him: 

Ahhhh… now you remember?

I knew you would.

“As I was saying,” he continued. Then he stopped.

Looked down. Then looked at those gathered.

“I’ve forgotten what I wanted to say.”

“Agriculture!” someone called out.

(Actually, I did.)

“Yes! Thank you,” he said, looking in my direction and smiling.

(I told you he had a striking resemblance to Farrakhan, right? Smaller in size, same hair parting, devout Muslim.)

As he spoke, I wrote.These are my notes, reorganized into a blog.

Reorganising the Nation

There may be advantages in reorganising the country into geopolitical zones:

North-Central
North-West
North-East
Mid-Central
Mid-Central West
Mid-Central East
South-South
South-West
South-East

And in each of these zones, we build brand-new urban areas.

Purpose-built cities.Not ornamental capitals. Not administrative monuments.Cities dedicated to the workers of a new economy - The #AgricultureEconomy.

“I will lecture more on that structure soon,” he said. “Right now, I want to compare agriculture in Nigeria to agriculture in California.”

Why California?

It may seem arbitrary. It is not. Nigeria is roughly twice the size of California.

Since I conducted this study independently, and because time and bandwidth are finite, I proposed one simplifying assumption:

The effects of desertification are equally felt in both Nigeria and California.

Not perfect.

But it allows measurement.

And as we know: If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it.

Country X

Consider a country. Call it Country X. For our lecture, let X = Nigeria

Location: Inner corner of the Gulf of Guinea, West Coast of Africa.

Extent: 923,768 sq km — about 4 times the size of the UK and 2 times the size of California.

Population (2020): 206,139,589 (about 2.64% of the world’s population).

GDP: $446.543 billion.

Your task: Make this nation work. Increase GDP per capita. Do this by transforming Nigeria’s agriculture. Do this by learning from the California agriculture model.

Keep this in mind, always: If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it.

Cultivation Comparison

When we compare cultivation intensity:

RegionTotal Arable Land (Hectares)% Currently Cultivated
Nigeria~36.9 million~41% to 46%
California~3.8 million~90% to 95%

Nigeria has vast arable potential — but much of it remains unused.

California’s arable land, though smaller, is almost fully cultivated and beginning to contract.

Climate Comparison

Nigeria

Nigeria spans multiple climate zones:

  1. Arid and semi-arid in the far north
  2. Savannah and Guinea forest in the middle belt
  3. Tropical rainforest and coastal swamps in the south

Rainfall ranges from low in the north to very high in the south, with long growing seasons and high temperatures.

California

California’s climates include:

  1. Mediterranean (wet winters, dry summers)
  2. Semi-arid and arid interiors
  3. Alpine mountains

Agriculture thrives largely due to engineered water systems, not rainfall.

Semi-arid comparison:

**Northern Nigeria’s rainfall often exceeds that of California’s productive interior zones — yet California yields far more because of water infrastructure and management systems.**

The Agriculture Benchmark

California:

• ~100 million acres total land

• ~43 million acres agricultural use

• ~27 million acres cropland

Nigeria:

• ~228.3 million acres total land

• Arable estimates vary from ~37% to ~77%

Variations in arable land estimates tell a story of its own: unreliable data. A problem in itself.

Nigeria has twice actually, 2.28 times) California’s land mass and roughly five times its population.

Mission: Build an agriculture economy at least as large.

How Do We Get There?

1. Start With the Scoreboard

Define the numbers that matter and track them regularly — land utilisation, yields, loss rates, irrigation coverage, logistics times, financing access, market prices, export volumes. Measurable goals create accountability.

2. Choose Priority Value Chains

Instead of generic “agriculture,” focus on specific industries that fit each zone — rice, cassava, tomatoes, cocoa, poultry, dairy, aquaculture, etc. Link production to processing and markets.

3. Build Purpose-Driven Agro-Industrial Cities

These are cities built around agricultural production, processing and logistics, not politics. With reliable power, water, storage, labs, training centres, housing and services for workers.

4. Fix Water Like It Is Electricity

Water is the backbone of production. Map basins, restore existing infrastructure, expand irrigation with solar pumps and drip systems, and protect watersheds.

5. Make Logistics Reliable and Cheap

Transport and loss reduction are major constraints. Secure corridors, aggregation hubs, weighbridges and cold chains should be standard.

6. Improve Inputs

No scaling through fake seed or adulterated fertiliser. Certified seed systems, traceability and mechanisation as a service must be the norm.

7. Finance Value Chains, Not Speeches

Structured capital, warehouse receipts, blended finance, index insurance and payment on verified delivery — not scattered loans.

8. Make Processing the Magnet

Processing adds value, creates jobs, reduces waste and builds exports. Tomato paste, starch, flour, edible oils, dairy and feed products should be expanded everywhere climate permits 

9. Standards and Data

Effective standards, functioning labs, predictable enforcement and a national data platform are foundational to confidence and trade.

10. Governance That Delivers

Zone Agriculture Delivery Units with clear targets, public dashboards, transparent procurement and accountability will keep progress visible.

A Simple 90–180 Day Start

  1. Select pilot zones and anchor industries
  2. Publish baseline metrics
  3. Identify aggregation and processing sites
  4. Rehabilitate irrigation in pilot zones
  5. Sign enforceable offtake agreements
  6. Enforce input certification
  7. Publish weekly price and volume reports

Conclusion

“Nigeria!” he said in a loud voice, “is ecologically diverse and, in aggregate, more naturally endowed for agriculture than California. But California is systemically superior in agricultural organisation. Climate does not determine output. Management does.”

He rang the little silver bell he carried to indicate the general lecture was over and the Thermodynamics class was about to start.

(That was the day, I believe, that he got a standing ovation.)

Don Kenobi

#BigAgendaAfrica

#CultureNotStructure

Sunday, July 5, 2026

The Gospel vs. The Anti-Gospel [What exactly is wrong with Philippians 4:8?]

 

On Philippians 4:8, Magnifica Humanitas, and the Moral Imagination of Our Age

Peter Thiel criticizes Pope Leo's vision for AI, accusing him of serving China: A reflection on technology, morality, and the politics of ethical leadership.



What exactly is wrong with Philippians 4:8?

The question sounds absurd.

After all, Philippians 4:8 is one of the most universally admired passages in all of Scripture:

"Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."

It is difficult to imagine a more benign, more civilizational, more humanizing command.

Yet, if one pays close attention to our public discourse—particularly in this strange age of algorithmic outrage and ideological performance—it increasingly appears that many influential voices have, consciously or unconsciously, adopted its exact opposite.

So I decided to conduct a small experiment.

Rather than merely defend Philippians 4:8, I inverted it.

I asked:

What would the Anti-Philippians 4:8 look like?

It would sound something like this:

"Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is false, whatever is cruel, whatever is wrong, whatever is corrupt, whatever is ugly, whatever is shameful—if anything is vile or worthy of contempt—set your minds on such things."

Instead of truth — falsehood.
Instead of nobility — cruelty.
Instead of righteousness — wrongdoing.
Instead of purity — corruption.
Instead of loveliness — ugliness.
Instead of admirability — shame.
Instead of excellence — vileness.
Instead of what is praiseworthy — what deserves contempt.

It would look like this: 

And perhaps most importantly:

Instead of deliberately fixing one's mind on what elevates humanity, one deliberately dwells on what degrades it.

With that inversion, the landscape of modern outrage culture suddenly begins to make a terrifying kind of sense.

Do I need to spell it out?

It is a replacement.

A replacement of what?

Of an entire moral imagination.

From the spiritual to the political.

From the personal to the cultural.

At its heart lies a simple proposition:

These people do not seek the flourishing of all humanity.


The Gospel and the Anti-Gospel

This thought returned to me recently while watching two seemingly unrelated events unfold.

On one side, Peter Thiel launched yet another broadside against Pope Leo XIV and the moral vision he expressed regarding artificial intelligence.

Apparently, the Pope is now serving Chinese communism.

On the other side, Elon Musk—his ideological cousin in many respects—criticized MacKenzie Scott's extraordinary philanthropy, lamenting that a woman who has voluntarily given away some $26 billion of her own wealth is somehow making the world worse.

Pause for a moment.

A woman gives away enough wealth to transform universities, hospitals, charities, communities and lives across the world.

The criticism is not that she has given too little.

It is that she has given at all.

At some point, one must stop asking political questions and begin asking theological ones.

Because beneath politics lies anthropology.

And beneath anthropology lies theology.

What, exactly, do these men believe a human being is?


What Did Pope Leo Actually Do?

He did something rather dangerous.

He proclaimed Magnifica Humanitas.

Magnificent Humanity.

Its vision is breathtakingly simple.

  • Every human being possesses inherent dignity.

  • Humanity is a creative force.

  • Compassion triumphs over power.

  • The extraordinary is found within ordinary people.

  • Human beings flourish through cooperation.

  • Resilience overcomes adversity.

  • Truth and wisdom are worth pursuing.

  • Freedom carries moral responsibility.

  • Diversity strengthens rather than weakens us.

  • Imagination shapes the future.

  • Humanity is simultaneously fragile and magnificent.

  • We are called to build a more humane world.

Humanity is magnificent not because we are perfect.

Not because we are innocent.

Not because we are wise.

But because every human being possesses an irreducible dignity that cannot be diminished by wealth—or the lack of it—by race, nationality, success, failure or power.

Let me say that again.

Humanity is magnificent because every human being possesses an irreducible dignity that neither wealth, power, race nor failure can erase.


Another Inversion

So I performed the same experiment again.

Rather than merely defend Magnifica Humanitas, I inverted it.

What would the anti-Magnifica Humanitas look like?

Perhaps something like this:

  • What if humanity possessed no inherent dignity?

  • What if human beings were merely instruments?

  • What if power mattered more than compassion?

  • What if ordinary people were expendable?

  • What if cooperation were weakness?

  • What if suffering demanded surrender rather than resilience?

  • What if truth were subordinate to utility?

  • What if freedom meant domination?

  • What if diversity meant division?

  • What if imagination itself became dangerous?

  • What if human fragility made us disposable rather than precious?

  • What if the future belonged not to hope, but to managed decline?

    It would look like this:

Can you recognize the pattern?

From the vilification of Bill Gates...
To the criticism of MacKenzie Scott...
To the gratuitous insults directed at Pope Leo XIV...

The inversion reveals not merely a political ideology, but an entire moral imagination.

An anti-humanism.

A worldview in which people are valued according to productivity, utility, loyalty, market value, tribal identity or ideological usefulness.

A world in which compassion becomes weakness.

Mercy becomes naïveté.

Generosity becomes pathology.


The Strange Psychology of Our Time

Here we encounter one of history's great ironies.

Many Americans—including many white Americans—view Trumpism and the MAGA movement as a warning rooted in painful historical experience.

Yet many others, including some Africans observing events from afar, see the same movement through a very different lens: as a symbol of strength, order, sovereignty or even salvation.

How fractured must our moral imagination become for the same figure to appear simultaneously as both warning and redeemer?

How damaged must it become before we begin to admire precisely those qualities that diminish our own humanity?

There is a deeper danger still.

A theology that persuades people to celebrate the very forces that diminish them.

A theology that teaches victims to defend their own victimhood.

In a recent essay titled, The Theology Of Self-Justification I described it this way:

Imagine a theology that not only oppresses its victims, but persuades them that they were created for their oppression.

A theology that convinces people they are less than—that they were created to be less than.

That their place beneath others is not injustice, but God's design.

That their suffering is not the result of human evil, but the natural order of the universe.

Few lies have been more powerful—or more destructive.

Full essay: Click 

 

The Molue Question

Back to more familiar surroundings.

The old Lagos molue.

There, these conversations were never theoretical.

Sooner or later, the old man sitting beside you would ask the only question that really matters.

"So, my friend... what kind of person does your philosophy—your theology—produce?"

Not what GDP it produces.

Not what elections it wins.

Not what stock prices it raises.

What kind of human being does it create?

Does it produce people who think about what is true, noble, just, pure, lovely and admirable?

Or does it produce people who dwell endlessly upon humiliation, domination, grievance, spectacle, outrage and contempt?

Because eventually...

Every civilization becomes the object of its contemplation.

We become what we choose to admire.

And perhaps that is why Paul's ancient instruction remains so revolutionary.

Think on these things.

Not because doing so makes us weak.

But because it is one of the surest ways to remain fully human.


Don Kenobi

#OldManInTheMolue
#MyFrancisEssays
#BigAgendaAfrica
#MagnificaHumanitas
#TheGospelVsTheAntiGospel

Friday, July 3, 2026

Some Equations Cannot Be Solved. Some Church Teachings Cannot Be Reconciled with Christ.

 

The Mathematics of Faith: Some Equations Cannot Be Solved....


Can every Christian tradition be reconciled with Christ?
A reflective Molue Monologue on faith, mathematics, grace, and why some Christian arguments cannot be solved—not because they're difficult, but because truth was removed from the equation.

The Argument

He listened quietly as they argued.

The topic this time was a respected religious leader defending the Head of State.

Voices rose. Someone quoted Scripture. Another quoted the Constitution. Everyone was certain.

He said nothing.

He had spent the entire day Molue-hopping, climbing aboard one bus after another, speaking wherever people would listen. Sometimes for five minutes. Sometimes until the conductor shouted for him to get down.

By evening, he was exhausted.


One Last Stop

There was only one stop left before heading home.

The Amala joint at Iddo.

A plate of hot àmàlà, ẹ̀wẹ̀dú and gbẹ̀gìrì would quiet the hunger in his earthly belly.

He smiled.

He loved this simple life.

No title. No office. No entourage.

Just buses, conversations, strangers… and Christ.

The argument grew louder.

Someone declared that loyalty to authority was the highest Christian virtue. Another insisted that the Church must never criticize the government.

An elderly woman simply shook her head.

He looked up.

"There comes a time to bow out."

A pause.

"Hint: Pope Benedict."

The bus fell silent.


The Mathematics of Truth

"My greatest regret?"

"I spent decades believing I wasn't good enough."

The passengers looked at him.

"I loved mathematics. Beautiful subject. An equation is simply two sides that look different—but are, in fact, the same."

He smiled.

"The venerable pastor has a PhD in Mathematics."

Another pause.

"But here's the thing…

Some equations cannot be solved."

A young man interrupted.

"Why? Because they're too difficult?"

He shook his head.

"No.

Because they were never equations in the first place."


When the Premise Is False

He reached into his bag and unfolded a sheet of paper.

On it was written:

2 cups of white sand + 2 eggs + 2 tablespoons of baking soda + 2 tablespoons of brown sugar = 3 loaves of chocolate bread.

"Now answer this."

"How many eggs do you need to make ten loaves of chocolate bread?"

Nobody spoke.

"You cannot solve it. Not because you're bad at mathematics.

Because the premise is false."

He folded the paper.

"If your recipe can never produce chocolate bread, no amount of algebra will rescue it."

The conductor shouted the next bus stop.

Nobody moved.


The Wrong Equation

"I've spent much of my life watching Christians argue over equations.

Denomination versus denomination.

Tradition versus tradition.

Doctrine versus doctrine."

He sighed.

"And every now and then I discover that the problem isn't that the equation is difficult.

It's that Christ was removed from it long ago."

Silence settled over the bus.


The Unseen Canopy

"Our faith in God is what makes us beautiful in His sight. It is what carries us through adversity.

He will test us—there is no doubt about that.

But His grace is the unseen canopy stretched beneath us, ready to catch us when we stumble… when we slip… when we fall… when we think we've disappointed Him beyond repair."

He looked out of the window.

"It is a love story.

Creation itself is a love story.

Those who most desperately need His mercy often discover that He was closest to them all along.

Not watching from a distance.

Not indifferent.

Cheering.

Waiting.

Calling.

Lifting."

His voice softened.

"One day, those sad eyes of yours—and mine—will finally realize that He never stopped watching over us."


The Only Question That Matters

He laughed quietly.

"Where was I?

Ah… yes.

Some equations cannot be solved.

And some Christian traditions cannot be reconciled with Christ."

He gathered his papers.

"My greatest regret wasn't that I failed.

It was that I believed I wasn't worthy to speak about Christ.

So I chased the foolish desires of my own heart instead."

One last pause.

"Perhaps that's why I no longer worry about winning arguments.

I'm more interested in asking whether the equation itself is true."


Iddo

Then he quoted Friedrich Nietzsche:

"Those who have ideals but fail to reach them live more frivolously than those who have none."

The conductor slapped the side of the bus.

"Iddo!"

He smiled, climbed down, brushed the dust from his trousers, and walked towards the Amala joint.

His earthly belly was hungry.

But his soul...
His soul was full.

Don Kenobi
#OldManInTheMolue
#MyFrancisEssays 



Baptismal Pools, Political Religion, and the Kingdom of God

  Baptismal Pools, Political Religion, and the Kingdom of God Baptismal Pools, Political Religion, and the Kingdom of God,  is a reflective ...