Wednesday, December 24, 2025

Of Macedonian Calls: A Rebuttal Of Violence Walking Alongside Christliness

Breaking the Cycle:

Christ, Conflict and the Misuse of the Macedonian Call


Pilate, the Pharisees, and a Misapplied Call

If you claim Trump answered your Macedonian call, how is that different from Pontius Pilate answering the “call” of the scribes and Pharisees to dispose of Jesus?

Even that would be an unfair comparison for by Scripture itself, Pilate demonstrated a sense of justice and decorum. (John 18:38; Matthew 27:24).


The Call That Was Never Made

Imagine, for a moment, if the Pharisees had been less self-righteous and had actually called upon the Lord, in the spirit of Isaiah where God Himself declares, “Come now, let us reason together” (Isaiah 1:18). 

Imagine if they had descended from their thrones of moral certainty and engaged the lowly Son of a carpenter.

 How radically different might history have been?


The Roads History Did Not Take

 How radically different might history have been?

For one thing, there might have been no pogroms against Jews by a unified Judeo-Christian community.

Perhaps there  no destruction of the Temple in AD 70—perhaps because Rome, under Vespasian, might have encountered a that may have appealed to him more. One he might have adopted as a means of binding his empire together: Centuries before Constantine.


Estranged Siblings of One Covenant

Imagine if they had climbed down from their thrones and sought dialogue with the Christ they dismissed: Perhaps Judaism and Christianity would have remained one continuous covenantal family, rather than estranged siblings (Romans 11:17 to 24).

Perhaps there would have been no Holocaust, the culmination of 2,000 years  of theological contempt. 

Alas, we can only imagine.

Perhaps even the later animosity between Islam and Judeo-Christian civilization might have taken a different shape, had the original custodians of revelation chosen humility over hostility.


What a True Macedonian Call Requires

The Macedonian call was legitimate because it arose from divine initiative, not human agitation.
. It did not originate with Paul.
. Not with Macedonian leaders.
. Not with political or religious authorities.

Scripture presents it as God’s own interruption and redirection of mission.
Paul did not manufacture the call.
He received it.
And he did not act on it impulsively.

Acts records: “We concluded that God had called us” (Acts 16:10)....
....“We concluded that God had called us”.

That phrase matters.

An Active Mission Already Underway

Before the vision, Paul, Silas, and Timothy were already preaching and strengthening churches in Asia Minor (modern Turkey).

Paul was not idle, confused, or looking for an excuse to escalate anything. He was actively engaged in ordinary, faithful mission

Doors Were Explicitly Shut to focus his mind on What God truly desired. Scripture states this twice: “They were forbidden by the Holy Spirit to speak the word in Asia.” (Acts 16:6). “When they attempted to go into Bithynia, the Spirit of Jesus did not allow them.” (Acts 16:7)

This matters theologically.
The Macedonian Call was not Paul’s first option.
It was the result of obedient restraint.


3. Paul Waited at Troas

Only after being stopped in Asia and Bithynia (by the Holy Spirit Spirit), did Paul arrive at Troas, a coastal city—a place of pause. It is there, after obedience, frustration, uncertainty, and submission to restraint that the vision came.


4. The Vision

“A man of Macedonia was standing there, urging him and saying,‘Come over to Macedonia and help us.’” (Acts 16:9)

The call was visionary, not political. Specific not rhetorical. Peaceful, not militarized. 

That has been my point all along.


When Narratives Become Self-Fulfilling Prophecies

We may not have authored the jihad or Fulani expansionism narrative, but we accepted it uncritically, amplified it rhetorically, and repeated it until it became a self-fulfilling prophecy. In doing so, we neglected the explicit biblical pattern for addressing strife, correction, and coexistence (Romans 12:18; Hebrews 12:14).


The Question That Must Be Asked of Us

If Islam is indeed a religion of violence, as many assert, and violence is its theological endpoint, then a question must be asked of us.

What are we?

If we are a religion of violence, let us say so plainly.

Let us abandon the Sermon on the Mount, discard the Cross, and embrace the sword (Matthew 26:52). 

But if we profess peace, and yet attempt to answer violence with violence, we will fail every time, not merely tactically, but theologically (Romans 12:19 to 21).


Captives of Human Reasoning

Until we learn again to ask, “What would Jesus do?”, we will remain captives of human reasoning, which Scripture explicitly warns against elevating above divine wisdom (Proverbs 3:5; 1 Corinthians 1:20).

As I wrote previously, and I restate it here.

“Christliness is either Christly, or it is Christly, or it is Christly, Christly, Christly, Christly. It never takes a vacation and becomes less than Christly, not for any reason in heaven or on earth.

This is why we must remain wary of un-Christly personages who present themselves as saviors of Christianity.

 God has always used the unrighteous to chastise the unrighteous (Habakkuk 1:6; Isaiah 10:5 to 7). 

The moment we suspend the character of Christ in pursuit of expedient solutions, we position ourselves for judgment at the hands of those more wicked than ourselves.

Judgment begins in the house of God (1 Peter 4:17).

I trust you grasp my meaning. You are a journalist of note, and therefore a custodian of moral framing.

Authority Without Discernment

You also know my long-held view regarding the Christian Association of Nigeria.

By their fruits, they should more accurately be described as the Church Owners Association of Nigeria. 

Whether by intent or by negligence, they have defined the Christian-Muslim question in Nigeria so poorly that effects have been mistaken for causes, and those effects have multiplied into larger crises (Matthew 7:16).

Thus, a snowball has become an avalanche.


The Ministry of Reconciliation

I did not intend to write all this.

I am merely yielding to what Scripture calls the prompting of the Spirit, who even now seeks men willing to break cycles of vengeance and restore the ministry of reconciliation entrusted to the Church (2 Corinthians 5:18 to 19).

I rest.

Don Kenobi 

December 24th-2025

Tuesday, December 23, 2025

Man 1: Remember the era when barbarian invasions helped bring down the Roman Empire—and, in the process, reshaped Europe?

Man 2: Wait—barbarian invasions caused the Dark Ages? No one ever puts it quite like that.

Man 1: Listen carefully. The rise of the barbarians led to the fall of the Roman elite. The fall of the Roman elite led to the collapse of the Western Roman Empire. And with the fall of the Western Roman Empire…the Dark Ages descended upon what was once an orderly world.

Read this.

Collapse of Central Authority

With the collapse of central authority in 476 AD, following the fall of Rome, Western Europe lost the administrative, military, and economic systems that had sustained imperial order for centuries.

Decline of Urbanization and Infrastructure

This collapse triggered a sharp decline in urban life and infrastructure. Trade networks disintegrated, cities emptied, roads and aqueducts fell into disrepair, and society steadily retreated into rural isolation.

Loss of Literacy and Knowledge

From this followed a profound loss of literacy and learning. The Roman elite had been the custodians of education, law, and culture. With their disappearance came a steep decline in literacy and the loss of countless classical texts—many of which survived only through monastic preservation and later Arabic translations.

Rise of Feudalism

In the absence of central authority, power fragmented. Local warlords, kings, and landowners filled the vacuum, giving rise to feudalism—a system based not on institutions, but on personal loyalty, land, and force.

The Church as Custodian of Continuity

Though the Roman political elite vanished, the Catholic Church endured. It emerged as the primary custodian of law, learning, and continuity across Western Europe, preserving fragments of Roman order while reshaping them under spiritual authority.

A Wider Civilizational Context

This decline was not universal. While Western Europe experienced regression, the Byzantine Empire and the Islamic Caliphates flourished intellectually, scientifically, and administratively—preserving and expanding much of the classical inheritance the West had lost.

Conclusion

Yes—the fall of the Roman elite set the stage for the Dark Ages in Western Europe.


Man 1: I rest my case.


Don Kenobi | #OldManInTheMolue

Would Christ Have Enslaved Africans? A Christian Response to Slavery and Christliness



Would Christ Have Enslaved Africans?

A theological reflection
asking whether slavery can ever be Christly.

An examination of Christ and judgment,
of wheat and tares,

and of why slavery stands
in contradiction
to authentic Christianity.



Thank you for this https://www.facebook.com/share/v/17fp1iXx7p/ @Husman.Very educative. Here are my thoughts:

The Question That Will Not Go Away: Would Christ have enslaved Africans?

Question: Do you honestly believe that Christ would have packed Africans into ships like sardines, transported them to the New World - sold them to men more brutal than Himself?

Stood by and watched as unspeakable atrocities were committed against these stolen people - and their descendants for the next four hundred years?

Do you believe that Christ, being omniscient — knowing exactly how this would unfold — would stand back approvingly and say, “And I saw that it was good”?

From the bottom of your heart, do you believe that Christ would have enslaved Africans?

I know the answer.
Because I know that you know the answer.

And if you do know the answer, then why bear false witness against Christianity?

Let me explain.


On Christliness

There have always been opponents of Christliness — that is, of being like Christ.
The reason is straightforward: Christliness makes no sense to the natural human mind. It never has.

The core of Christianity is a paradox: God born of His own creature.

From the very beginning, it is an anomaly. And while anomalies threaten human systems of order, they pose an even greater threat to what Scripture calls principalities, powers, rulers of darkness, and spiritual wickedness in high places.

If the Pharisees and Sadducees tore their garments at the mere possibility that Christ might be who He claimed to be, imagine the hostility in the spiritual realm toward Christliness itself.

This matters because opposition to Christliness exists precisely because Christliness threatens the powers that thrive on darkness. If one wished to oppose Christ, the first strategy would be to sow doubt — to associate Christ with evil, hypocrisy, or cruelty.

That is not new.

Christianity has faced this from the time of Judas Iscariot to the present day. The technical term for it is Anti-Christianity, and it has always been with us.

A question is worth asking here:

Why is there no sustained Anti-Buddha movement?
No Anti-Confucius?
No Anti-Judaism?
No Anti-Islam?

Why is Christianity consistently the target of empires, institutions, and cultural campaigns?


How Jesus Addresses Error and Corruption

Now consider how Jesus Himself addresses error and corruption.

Judaism historically executed heretics.
Islam still does in some places today.

Jesus does neither.

Instead, He tells the parable of the wheat and the tares.

A farmer sows good seed (wheat) in his field. While everyone sleeps, an enemy comes and sows weeds among the wheat. When the plants grow, the servants notice the weeds and ask if they should pull them out.

The farmer says no — if they uproot the weeds now, they may destroy the wheat as well. Instead, both are allowed to grow together until harvest time. At harvest, the weeds will be gathered first and burned, and the wheat gathered into the barn.

Premature judgment, He teaches, risks destroying the righteous along with the wicked.
Final judgment belongs to God alone, and it will be perfectly just.

The point is not that evil is acceptable, but that human beings are not competent judges of hearts or destinies.

Patience is not weakness.
Tolerance is not approval.
Judgment is delayed — not denied.


What This Reveals About Christliness

This tells us something essential about Christliness: it does not change with circumstances. It does not take vacations. It is either Christly, or it is not.

Any un-Christliness that appears within the visible Church is not evidence against Christ, but evidence of tares sown by the enemy.

In the parable:

  • The field is the world

  • The good seed are the children of the Kingdom

  • The tares are the children of the evil one

  • The enemy is the devil

  • The harvest is the end of the age

  • The harvesters are the angels

And the farmer is Jesus Christ Himself.


Returning to Slavery

So we return to the question of slavery.

Those who came to Africa holding crosses while kidnapping human beings — were their actions Christly?

You already know the answer.

Slavery was not an expression of Christianity.
It was an expression of opposition to Christliness, even when cloaked in Christian language and symbols.

Scripture itself warns us that false apostles can disguise themselves as servants of righteousness.

If you already agree with this, then there is nothing more to argue.

Thank you Husman for the thought-provoking posts. Truly appreciated and I hope that I have done credit to the one that I truly love with all my heart!

You can LOVE Him too...

Don Kenobi

#MyFrancisEssays #Christliness | #ChristianityAndSlavery

#WhatWouldJesusDo | #FalseChristianity |#ParableOfTheTares




Monday, December 22, 2025

Does The Judgment of Korah Loom Over All Of Protestantism?

        The Judgment of Korah

A theological reflection on the rebellion of Korah in Numbers 16, 
exploring why divine fire consumed the 250 men
who offered incense.

This essay examines calling, authority, holiness,
and the danger of approaching God without mandate
Raising sobering questions for modern Christianity.

No passage of Scripture has ever so arrested my thought.
No passage of Scripture has ever quite so arrested my thought and made me want to throw everything I thought and believed. 

One thing's for  certain: I shall henceforth submit to Church authority.  Authority that itself submits upward, finally, to the Pope.

Why?

Because there is such a thing as Church hierarchy.

[And it is frightening]


Especially because  in one fell swoop, it places all of Protestantism in jeopardy. Under the shadow of the judgment of Korah. The Judgment of Korah!

The story of Korah—where “fire came out from the LORD and consumed the 250 men who were offering the incense”—is found in the Book of Numbers, chapter 16.

This question is unavoidable: What was their offence?

Here's what they did to offend God.....


1. They Usurped a Holy Office

Incense was not a generic act of worship.
In Israel, it was a priestly function, reserved exclusively for Aaron and his sons
(see Exodus 30; Leviticus 16).

Korah’s faction declared:

“All the congregation is holy.”

But they acted as though holiness erased calling.

The holiness of a people ≠ the authorization of roles.


2. They Treated Holiness as Entitlement

Their so-called “test”—each man bringing a censer—was not humility.
It was presumption.

They did not ask God whether they were called.
They assumed it—and dared God to contradict them.


3. Incense Magnifies Judgment

Incense symbolizes approach—drawing near to God.

To approach God without being sent
is more dangerous than staying away.

What sanctifies the obedient
consumes the rebellious.

The same fire that accepts sacrifice
also rejects presumption.


4. They Challenged God’s Order—Not Just Moses

God makes this explicit:

“You and all your company are gathered together against the LORD”
(Numbers 16:11)

This was not a political revolt.
It was a theological rebellion
a rejection of God’s chosen mediation.


5. A Warning to Future Generations

The censers were later hammered into plating for the altar
(Numbers 16:38–40).

They became a permanent memorialzeal without obedience is lethal.


In Short

They were not punished for worshipping.

They were punished for worshipping on their own terms.


Why Fire Fell

1. Calling Was Ignored

Meaning:
The divine calling already placed on God’s chosen leaders was treated as irrelevant.
Korah’s group claimed that everyone was called in the same way.

That single move erased:

  • distinction of office

  • divine appointment

  • mediated authority

Once God’s specific calling is flattened into general holiness,
no calling remains at all—only ambition dressed as equality.


2. Authority Was Despised

Meaning:
They rejected the divinely established priesthood as illegitimate and unnecessary.


3. Holiness Was Treated Casually

Meaning:
They mistook personal piety and group sanctity for authorization to handle holy things.


4. God Was Approached Without Permission

Meaning:
They drew near to God in a way He had not commanded,
invoking presence without mandate.


The Lesson

The lesson is stark—and timeless:

Not everyone who wants to minister is sent.
And not everyone who feels holy is authorized.

Terrifying.


Questions

  1. Are you ignoring the divine calling already placed on God’s chosen leaders—treating it as irrelevant?

  2. Do you reject the divinely established priesthood as illegitimate and unnecessary?

  3. Do you mistake personal piety and group sanctity for authorization to handle holy things?

  4. Do you approach God without permission—drawing near in a way He has not commanded?


The lesson remains:

Not everyone who wants to minister is sent.
And not everyone who feels holy is authorized.

Terrifying.

Lord, help us.

Sunday, December 21, 2025

Early Christian Writings Not Included in the Bible Canon

 Early Christian Writings Not Included in the Bible Canon

1. Didache

  • An early church manual on Christian ethics, baptism, fasting, and the Eucharist.
  • Widely used in catechesis and worship.
  • Excluded because it was instructional, not apostolic Scripture.

2. Shepherd of Hermas

  • A visionary, allegorical work on repentance and moral discipline.
  • Extremely popular; some early churches read it publicly.
  • Rejected because it was written too late (2nd century) and not apostolic.

3. 1 Clement

  • A pastoral letter from Clement of Rome to the Corinthian church.
  • Read aloud in churches and respected for its theology.
  • Excluded because Clement was not an apostle.

4. Epistle of Barnabas

  • An allegorical interpretation of the Old Testament.
  • Popular in Alexandria and quoted by early theologians.
  • Rejected due to questionable authorship and theology.

5. Apocalypse of Peter

  • Graphic visions of heaven and hell.
  • Nearly made it into the canon in some regions.
  • Ultimately rejected for theological excesses and late authorship.

6. Gospel of Thomas

  • A collection of sayings attributed to Jesus.
  • Popular among Gnostic groups.
  • Rejected because it lacked narrative, promoted secret knowledge, and conflicted with apostolic teaching.

7. Gospel of Peter

  • A retelling of Jesus’ passion with docetic elements.
  • Initially accepted in some churches.
  • Rejected for heretical Christology.

8. Acts of Paul and Thecla

  • Popular stories about Paul and a female disciple, Thecla.
  • Celebrated asceticism and female leadership.
  • Excluded as legendary rather than historical.

🧭 Why These Books Were Excluded

The early Church used several guiding principles:

  • Apostolic origin (written by an apostle or close companion)
  • Orthodoxy (consistent with received teaching)
  • Catholicity (widely used across the Church)
  • Antiquity (dating to the apostolic era)

Many of these books were edifying but not authoritative.


 Key Insight

The early Church did not reject these writings because they were useless, but because Scripture was treated with extreme caution. They drew a clear line between:

  • Helpful Christian literature, and
  • Inspired, apostolic Scripture

This distinction is central to understanding Sola Scriptura and why the canon took centuries to finalize.


(c) VRA

Saturday, December 20, 2025

I Wrestled with St. Augustine. He Won.



I Wrestled with St. Augustine. Theology Won.

A candid theological reflection on wrestling with St. Augustine, 

Learning to accept correction, and discovering how grace still works through weaknesss

 


Preamble: Entering the Ring

As I summoned the little theology I thought I knew to challenge the thoughts of a great theologian,
that same theology knocked me out — not a TKO, but a total KO.

Let’s just say this:
it takes a special kind of confidence to wrestle with the greatest theologian in Christendom.

I am impressed by my own precocity.

After all, if the Almighty Himself says,

“Come now, and let us reason together,”

then I believe I can sit and reason with anyone —
not out of pride,
but from a sincere desire to learn.


On Learning, Correction, and Fragile Egos

Many people truly hate learning — or being corrected.

To them, correction feels like a repudiation of their entire identity.

They never say thank you when you point out an error they may have made.
Instead, they explain why they made the mistake.

Or worse — they ignore you entirely,
convinced in their minds that you “think you know everything”
and only corrected them to assert some superiority complex.

But we should be more like an assembly line.

Someone sends new information or a suggestion your way:

  • Take it.

  • Examine it.

  • Refine it.

  • Send it back — or build on it and pass it to the next person in line.

Keep moving.

Perhaps then, we’d actually grow.


A Necessary Digression (This Is a Soliloquy, Don’t You Know?)

This pre-script — though twice as long —
is actually a post-script to the rest of the essay which follows.

I am building a soliloquy — don’t you know?

To operate in assembly-line mode, however, we must be specialists at something in particular.
At least, that was the case for a hundred years — until the information revolution changed all that.


The Assembly Line, Corporate Edition

Back in the day, when I worked for a multinational,
I sometimes realised that what used to take an entire month
could now be accomplished in a day or two.

I’d issue RFQs to companies in China and Europe,
compare options,
make a decision,
place a requisition on EMA 3000
(yes — now you know where I worked),
and forward it to my boss — who may or may not approve.

All in a day’s work.

Just one of the benefits of information systems —
and of the assembly-line mentality:

Do your bit.
Move on.
Trust the process.

Of course, assembly lines sometimes produce defects.

In fact, there’s an entire discipline dedicated to studying why defects occur…

But I digress.


Back to the Audacity: Me vs. Augustine

I was talking about St. Augustine — and my audacity.

I was reflecting on something Father Prince Chidi Philip wrote recently
about sinful priests consecrating the Eucharist,
and how the Eucharist is still fully consecrated
despite the priest’s sinfulness.

And I balked.

“No,” I thought.
“No!”

And that brings us — quite neatly —
to something I had written earlier, without explaining why.

Here’s what I wrote a few hours ago:


Exhibit A: Peak Audacity

“I really, truly cannot accept that a priest in mortal sin can consecrate the Host.
In my opinion, St. Augustine was simply wrong.”

(See my audacity?)


Exhibit B: Still Swinging

“Grace is not enough in such circumstances.
Grace completes what your human hands have striven to perform and failed —
not for lack of effort,
but for lack of strength —
because you are weak.”

(Still powering on at this stage…)

Then it hit me.

BAM! 💥


Exhibit C: The Turn

“Then again… perhaps St. Augustine was right.
Mortal sin is a state we find ourselves in because we are not strong enough to overcome.
And so, grace is still available —
if we confess our sins…
Hmm.”


Humble Pie (Served Hot)

“Maybe habitual sin is the true deal-breaker.
Not weakness once or twice,
but a pattern.
A refusal.

Make I rest small. (I get headik!)”

[When you hit the canvas. You go get headik]


Conclusion: Counted Out

As I summoned the little theology I thought I knew
to challenge the thoughts of a great theologian,
that same theology knocked me out —
not a TKO,
but a total KO.

Don Kenobi | July-3-2025

#OldManInTheMolue #MyFrancisEssays #StAugustine #ChristianTheol#MolueMonologues #FaithReflections #TheologicalSoliloquy #ThinkingOutLoud #WrestlingWithTruthogy #GraceAndTruth #FaithAndReason #TheologyInPublic #Humility #LearningToLearn 


Tuesday, December 16, 2025

When Slogan Replaces Real Nation-Building

When Slogan Replaces Real Nation-Building

Restructuring becomes Another Scam...

Don Kenobi Argues: A problem well defined is half solved.
But when a society lies to itself about what the problem is,
the problem doesn’t wait
It multiplies.
Nigeria’s political obsession with “restructuring” has become a substitute
for real planning and nation-building. This essay argues that restructuring
is now a hollow slogan—no different from past policy scams
—used to avoid accountability, delay hard work, and preserve elite
harvest cycles while citizens remain trapped in poverty. 

Nigeria’s leaders do not genuinely plan to develop Nigeria.
They show no love for the country, and no concern for the struggling masses.

This indifference is visible in every major economic index.
Over the last 30 to 40 years, exchange rates and GDP per capita have steadily declined.

  • The percentage of citizens living in abject, crushing poverty has risen to more than half the population.
  • We remain dependent on extractive industries.
  • For decades—though we were at the time the 6th largest exporter of crude oil—we imported refined petroleum products. Make that make sense to a 10-year-old!
  • Manufacturing is weak.
  • Electricity supply is anaemic.
  • Our per-capita electricity consumption—kWh per person—for a nation of nearly 250 million people is roughly on par with that of the city of London.

Should I go on?

But the leaders are not alone.....

...The long succession of bad governments— with the exceptions of Presidents Gowon and Obasanjo—forces me to confront an uncomfortable truth:

The problem may lie less with government alone, and more with the people who repeatedly produce and tolerate it.

But here's where government people are guilty:

In their minds, the developed West—and the rapidly developing East—are their real homes. Nigeria is not a home to be built, but a resource to be harvested.

A mine.
Gold. Bauxite.
A farm heavy with low-hanging fruit.

They THINK NOT of stewardship.
RATHER, extraction.

And so they invite outsiders:
“Come, my brother. Bring a big basket.”

And the outsiders come....

.... With their INVITERS, they harvest Nigeria’s wealth and leave to Dubai, London, Mumbai, Johannesburg.

When the baskets run low, they return to refill them and off they go - to Beirut, Rio, Paris—name any global city.

Nigeria has quietly become a breadbasket for the world’s wealthy, while its own people sink deeper into poverty.

(Sadly, the ordinary people on the streets would do exactly

the same if you replaced those in government with them.)


The Vineyard Illusion

Our leaders do not see themselves as nation-builders.
They see themselves as harvesters.

To them, Nigeria is a vineyard, its branches heavy with grapes.
They imagine they are merely helping with the harvest.

Scripture says:

“The harvest truly is great, but the labourers are few.”

But Scripture also says:

“Pray to the Lord of the harvest, that He would send forth labourers into His harvest.”

We are meant to be the labourers.
Not the grapes.

Instead, our leaders preside over a cycle of harvesting in which only they—and their associates—eat.
Their wealth grows.
The people’s poverty deepens.

A Simple Mathematical Insight

Permit a short mathematical digression.

I am not a mathematician.
But even basic mathematics teaches something useful: relationships matter.

Specifically, proportionality. What we observe is this: As their cycle of harvest increases, the people’s cycle of poverty deepens.

In simple terms: Their Abundance (TA) = k / Our Deprivation (OD)

Where "k" is a constant they protect fiercely. This is not accidental. It is systemic.

Assignment: What is "k"?


The Promise of “Restructuring”

So how do we change this?

Many insist the answer is Restructuring.

Ask them a simple question: “What exactly should we restructure? And how do we begin?”

The answer is usually this: “That will happen after restructuring. Let us restructure first!”

Press further: “So what is restructuring? How do we start it? Why can’t we begin on Monday, on July 1st, or on Independence Day?”

The reply changes in tone, not in meaning: “The cabal is stopping us.”

Go further ask, "Which cabal?"

This is likely to be their answer: “Are you not in this country?”


Why Restructuring Has Become a Scam

At this point, clarity is required. Restructuring has become a slogan, not a solution.

It sounds intelligent. It feels profound.
But it explains nothing and commits us to nothing.

It now functions exactly like past national distractions—especially the fuel subsidy debate. We were told:

• Removing subsidy would stop smuggling.
• Higher petrol prices would lead to new refineries.
• Pain today would bring prosperity tomorrow.

Decades later, none of that is true.

Restructuring is following the same path—
endless debate, zero accountability, no action.


No Shortcuts

Nigeria is not one election away from salvation.
Not one policy away.
Not one restructuring away.

Not one 'political saviour away....

The truth is simpler and harder: Nation-building takes time. It requires discipline, planning, and persistence. There are no shortcuts.

The sooner we stop searching for magic words, for good-hearted politicians, the sooner real work can begin.


Shamans and Totems

This obsession with restructuring reminds me of shamans dancing around a totem—elaborately dressed, loudly chanting, claiming to heal disease.

But we already know what causes illness.
And we already know how healing works.

Political slogans are not medicine.

Let no political shaman deceive you.

Don’t be a MUGU: A Problem Well Defined Is A Problem Half-Solved



I rest my case.

Don Kenobi

#BigAgendaAfrica 



Baptismal Pools, Political Religion, and the Kingdom of God

  Baptismal Pools, Political Religion, and the Kingdom of God Baptismal Pools, Political Religion, and the Kingdom of God,  is a reflective ...