If There Are Fifty Righteous…
Don Kenobi reflects on Abraham’s plea for Sodom and asks an urgent question for our time: Can any cause justify the indiscriminate destruction of innocent lives?
At its heart is a timeless moral truth: we have a duty to defend the innocent, whoever they are.
Abraham Negotiates With God
I have just watched a documentary about Abraham. The scene that stayed with me was the moment God revealed His intention to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah, and Abraham began what can only be described as a negotiation with God.
Abraham asked:
“What if there are fifty righteous people in the city? Will You really sweep them away with the wicked?”
God answered that He would spare the entire city for the sake of those fifty.
But Abraham continued. What if there were forty-five? Forty? Thirty? Twenty? Finally, ten?
Each time, God assured him that He would not destroy the city if that number of righteous people could be found within it.
Later, I would like to estimate the population of Sodom and Gomorrah at the time and calculate what percentage fifty people represented. That calculation matters, and I will explain why.
Sodom’s Sin Was Bigger Than Sexual Immorality
The angels eventually entered Sodom, and we know what followed. The men of the city, young and old, surrounded Lot’s house and demanded access to his visitors. The account presents a society in which corruption had become almost universal and every boundary of decency had collapsed.
It is easy to look at Sodom and Gomorrah entirely through the prism of sexual immorality. But sexual immorality was only one manifestation of a much deeper corruption.
The prophet Ezekiel described Sodom’s sin more broadly:
“She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy.”
A society may incur the wrath of God through many forms of wickedness. Its sin does not have to be sexual.
Cruelty is immorality. Oppression is immorality. Indifference to suffering is immorality. The destruction of innocent lives is immorality.
Shall Not the Judge of All the Earth Do Right?
This is what gives Abraham’s conversation with God such profound contemporary meaning.
Abraham was not defending wickedness. He was pleading for justice. He was asking whether the innocent should be destroyed alongside the guilty:
“Will You indeed sweep away the righteous with the wicked? Shall not the Judge of all the earth do what is just?”
That question echoes through history.
For me, Abraham represents the godly person who sees even one innocent life as worthy of defence. He stands before God and makes the case for people he does not know.
His intercession tells us that protecting innocent life is not weakness, sentimentality or betrayal. It is an expression of justice itself.
No Cause Makes Innocent Blood Insignificant
The indiscriminate destruction of innocent people is ungodly.
To believe that children, families and ordinary people may simply be sacrificed for a cause requires a terrible moral surrender. No cause, however loudly proclaimed, can make the blood of the innocent insignificant.
People who believe that others must die for their cause may claim the moral high ground, but their willingness to destroy innocent lives reveals the opposite.
How Loud Must Their Cries Be in Heaven?
Think about what the cries of Sodom and Gomorrah represented. The cries of its victims rose to God, and God heard them.
Now think about the cries of innocent people today.
Think of the children.
Think of the terrified families.
Think of those buried beneath the consequences of decisions they did not make.
If their cries reached heaven, how loud would they be?
That is all I have to say about this matter.
Don Kenobi
#MyFrancisEssays #Abraham
#SodomAndGomorrah
#Justice #InnocentLives
#FaithAndConscience #ChristianReflection
No comments:
Post a Comment